Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature/remove-deprecated-fields #29

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

fivetran-catfritz
Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-catfritz fivetran-catfritz commented Nov 5, 2024

PR Overview

This PR will address the following Issue/Feature:

This PR will result in the following new package version:

  • v0.5.0 Breaking due to source package schema change.

Please provide the finalized CHANGELOG entry which details the relevant changes included in this PR:

Breaking Changes

  • Removed unused fields from stg_recurly__subscription_history in the upstream dbt_recurly_source package (see CHANGELOG):
    • converted_at
    • has_started_with_gift
  • These fields were removed since they are planned for future deprecation in the Fivetran Connector and are not explicitly called in the end models.

PR Checklist

Basic Validation

Please acknowledge that you have successfully performed the following commands locally:

  • dbt run –full-refresh && dbt test
  • dbt run (if incremental models are present) && dbt test

Before marking this PR as "ready for review" the following have been applied:

  • The appropriate issue has been linked, tagged, and properly assigned
  • All necessary documentation and version upgrades have been applied
  • docs were regenerated (unless this PR does not include any code or yml updates)
  • BuildKite integration tests are passing
  • Detailed validation steps have been provided below

Detailed Validation

Please share any and all of your validation steps:

  • Confirmed columns removed in source

If you had to summarize this PR in an emoji, which would it be?

💃

@fivetran-catfritz fivetran-catfritz self-assigned this Nov 5, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@fivetran-joemarkiewicz fivetran-joemarkiewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM just one small CHANGELOG adjustment note, but nothing work blocking release review.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
# dbt_recurly v0.5.0
[PR #29](https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_recurly/pull/29) includes the following breaking changes:
## Breaking Changes
- Removed unused fields from `stg_recurly__subscription_history` in the upstream `dbt_recurly_source` package (see [CHANGELOG](https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_recurly_source/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#dbt_recurly_source-v030)):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small suggestion to link the release notes instead of the CHANGELOG. This way it directs the customer to a focused version of the CHANGELOG in the form of the release.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated.

packages.yml Outdated
Comment on lines 2 to 6
# - package: fivetran/recurly_source
# version: [">=0.3.0", "<0.4.0"]
- git: https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_recurly_source.git
revision: feature/remove-deprecated-fields
warn-unpinned: false
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reminder to swap before release.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto!

Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-avinash fivetran-avinash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fivetran-catfritz
Can you also bump the versions of the dbt_project.yml and integration_tests/dbt_project.yml?

One additional suggestion, and after that you should be good!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@fivetran-catfritz fivetran-catfritz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fivetran-avinash Thanks for catching the version! I also commited your suggestion.

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@fivetran-avinash fivetran-avinash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

packages.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fivetran-catfritz fivetran-catfritz merged commit e6679a4 into main Nov 11, 2024
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants