Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Various cleanups #91
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Various cleanups #91
Changes from all commits
98f1c3e
9a39888
826e67c
c019a29
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While we're fixing this, something that I frequently find myself doing is just regenerating a single set of test vectors, instead of regenerating them all. Now that we no longer use
$2
, maybe if that's present we could use that argument as the sole value intv_scripts
instead of regenerating everything?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The approach of using
poetry run SCRIPT_NAME
directly doesn't put the files in the expected place by itself.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The (corrected) script takes a list of formats, so there would be a conflict unless it implemented more complicated argument parsing. You can always write
poetry run SCRIPT_NAME -t FORMAT >OUTPUT_FILE
, although I realize that's less convenient.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I see. Hm. I guess I'll just have to keep commenting out bits of this script when I need to regenerate stuff.