Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 4, 2024. It is now read-only.

UNC Env Check fixes. #24

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RexiRexii
Copy link

put consoleinfo on test() for debugging purposes
gethiddenproperty and sethiddenproperty returning their actual output
crypt.encrypt and crypt.decrypt standartization
getconnections should only check for common stuff

OMG THE DEV THAT MADE THIS SHOULD DIE
getconnections should only check for common things.
put consoleinfo on test() for debugging purposes
gethiddenproperty and sethiddenproperty returning their actual output
crypt.encrypt and crypt.decrypt standartization
getconnections should only check for common stuff
removed the isrenderobj requirement from Drawing.new, as it is not a common / required function for an exploit to run properly.
instead i added a check. If the exploit doesn't support isrenderobj it shall put a note instead.
@RexiRexii RexiRexii marked this pull request as draft August 10, 2022 17:12
- REMOVED THE LAST CHECK FROM SETSCRIPTABLE, ITS USELESS
- REMOVED THE STUPID == TRUE CHECK FROM SETHIDDENPROPERTY, IT JUST WONT WORK
- CHANGED CRYPT.ENCRYPT/DECRYPT UNC FORMAT TO SYNAPSE FORMAT BECAUSE EVERYBODY USES SYNAPSE FORMAT
-- deprecated the usage of getscriptbytecode from loadstring, do not make a simple function call a function that most exploits dont have.
-- deprecated the last setscriptable / sethiddenproperty assertion, they are simply wrong and shouldn't be there - as per stated
-- getscriptbytecode should be *optional*, it is not required in order to have a fully working executor
Copy link
Author

@RexiRexii RexiRexii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • deprecated usage of getscriptbytecode in loadstring test, its not required
  • deprecated last assertion inside setscriptable, whoever made that needs to get a checkup
  • deprecated last assertion(s) of gethiddenproperty and sethiddenproperty
  • getscriptbytecode needs to be optional it is not required in order to have a fully functioning exploit

@RexiRexii RexiRexii marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2023 22:33
@RexiRexii
Copy link
Author

  • setscriptable bug fix
  • loadstring no longer needs getscriptbytecode
  • gethiddenproperty/sethiddenproperty bug fix

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant