-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CLDR-17561 Utility for visiting DtdData elements #3646
Merged
macchiati
merged 2 commits into
unicode-org:main
from
macchiati:CLDR-17561-Utility-for-visiting-DtdData-elements
Apr 23, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
22 changes: 22 additions & 0 deletions
22
tools/cldr-code/src/main/java/com/ibm/icu/util/MatchElementAttribute.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
package com.ibm.icu.util; | ||
|
||
import com.google.common.collect.HashMultimap; | ||
import com.google.common.collect.Multimap; | ||
|
||
public class MatchElementAttribute { | ||
private Multimap<String, String> matchElementAttribute = | ||
HashMultimap.create(); // "" is a wildcard | ||
|
||
public MatchElementAttribute add(String... elementAttributePairs) { | ||
for (int i = 0; i < elementAttributePairs.length; i += 2) { | ||
matchElementAttribute.put(elementAttributePairs[i], elementAttributePairs[i + 1]); | ||
} | ||
return this; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public boolean matches(String element, String attribute) { | ||
return matchElementAttribute.containsEntry(element, attribute) | ||
|| matchElementAttribute.containsEntry("", attribute) | ||
|| matchElementAttribute.containsEntry(element, ""); | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Commented-out code and empty comments are messy to begin with, and messier due to deep indentation and formatting that breaks up some but not all pairs. Ideally the parameters for add() might be moved to a named constant defined outside the method call, less indented, maybe as an array of Map.Entry objects for element/attribute pairs...
The semantics of these elements and attributes are still mostly beyond my understanding. I sometimes wonder whether defining constants for such strings, maybe as members of enums, and referencing them as such rather than as string literals could be helpful for understanding the code and maybe for catching typos...