Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to radiation, cloud, and land processes for improved surface temperature and radiative flux biases #244

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: ufs/dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rhaesung
Copy link
Collaborator

@rhaesung rhaesung commented Jan 6, 2025

Changes from @RuiyuSun and @HelinWei-NOAA.

This PR addresses several key issues identified in the HRv4 and UFS/Noah-MP models, focusing on radiative flux biases, soil thermal conductivity, and evapotranspiration improvements. The goal of these updates is to enhance model performance and better align simulations with observed data.

  1. Cloud/Radiation adjustments:
  • To reduce the high bias in downward shortwave (DSW) radiative flux over land, the cloud number concentration over land has been increased from 100/cm³ to 150/cm³.
  • The convective cloud ice radius in radiation has been reduced from 50 µm to 25 µm.
  • The 2020 summer test results (HRv4Ntc100) show a reduction in the high DSW bias over land and a corresponding reduction in the low bias of upward shortwave (SW) radiative flux at the top of the atmosphere (TOA).
  1. Soil thermal conductivity enhancement:
  • A persistent nighttime and early morning warm surface temperature bias remains in both the GFS/Noah and UFS/Noah-MP models. This is partly due to overlooking the influence of soil organic matter (SOM) on soil thermal conductivity.
  • By incorporating a lookup table developed from the PNNL soil carbon dataset and VIIRS surface type data, the effects of SOM on soil thermal properties have been accounted for.
  • Tests show that including SOM results in better simulation of ground heat flux, reducing heat storage in the soil during the day, and mitigating the nighttime warm bias, particularly over the Great Plains.
  1. Evapotranspiration adjustment:
  • The aquifer hydraulic conductivity has been updated to use the algorithm average rather than the harmonic average. This increases the amount of water uptake by the soil layer, improving evapotranspiration modeling.
  1. Bug Fixes:

@RuiyuSun
Copy link
Collaborator

RuiyuSun commented Jan 6, 2025

@rhaesung please use radiation_clouds.f at /lfs/h2/emc/physics/noscrub/ruiyu.sun/git/global_workflow.git.hrv4/sorc/ufs_model.fd/FV3/ccpp/physics/physics/Radiation to replace the one you are using in this PR. This file uses 25 um as the convective cloud ice radius over land in radiation instead of 50 µm.

@HelinWei-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@rhaesung please use radiation_clouds.f at /lfs/h2/emc/physics/noscrub/ruiyu.sun/git/global_workflow.git.hrv4/sorc/ufs_model.fd/FV3/ccpp/physics/physics/Radiation to replace the one you are using in this PR. This file uses 25 um as the convective cloud ice radius over land in radiation instead of 50 µm.

@RuiyuSun A little confused here? The original value is 50 and you proposed to change it to 25, right?

@RuiyuSun
Copy link
Collaborator

RuiyuSun commented Jan 6, 2025

@rhaesung please use radiation_clouds.f at /lfs/h2/emc/physics/noscrub/ruiyu.sun/git/global_workflow.git.hrv4/sorc/ufs_model.fd/FV3/ccpp/physics/physics/Radiation to replace the one you are using in this PR. This file uses 25 um as the convective cloud ice radius over land in radiation instead of 50 µm.

@RuiyuSun A little confused here? The original value is 50 and you proposed to change it to 25, right?

@HelinWei-NOAA Right. But it is only changed over land.

@rhaesung
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rhaesung commented Jan 6, 2025

@RuiyuSun radiation_clouds.f has been updated.

Copy link

@climbfuji climbfuji left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the module_mp_thompson and radiation_clouds parts.

Copy link
Collaborator

@grantfirl grantfirl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rhaesung This looks good from a CCPP point of view. There will need to be a similar change for the NoahMP component model code in order to stay in sync.

@rhaesung
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rhaesung commented Jan 9, 2025

@rhaesung This looks good from a CCPP point of view. There will need to be a similar change for the NoahMP component model code in order to stay in sync.

@barlage @uturuncoglu @HelinWei-NOAA FYI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants