Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jbaublitz issue project 51 #1650

Closed

Conversation

mulkieran
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mulkieran mulkieran force-pushed the jbaublitz-issue-project-51 branch 3 times, most recently from c7213ec to 15681c5 Compare October 4, 2019 12:16
@mulkieran mulkieran force-pushed the jbaublitz-issue-project-51 branch from 15681c5 to 5e4ddf6 Compare October 7, 2019 16:26
It seems to fit in better with its usage.

Signed-off-by: mulhern <[email protected]>
Right now it serves no purpose. This is kind of surprising actually,
but currently it seems that the code always consumes self, so it makes
sense to leave this method out. We can easily add it back in, as
necessary.

Signed-off-by: mulhern <[email protected]>
It is but lightly used, and in many ways it is better to just consider
changed() as the boolean-returning method, just more expressive.

Signed-off-by: mulhern <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: mulhern <[email protected]>
@mulkieran
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by #1651.

@mulkieran mulkieran closed this Oct 24, 2019
@mulkieran mulkieran deleted the jbaublitz-issue-project-51 branch October 24, 2019 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants