Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Tag node_modules archive #971

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024
Merged

feat: Tag node_modules archive #971

merged 19 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

tianfeng92
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Introducing a tagging solution for the node_modules archive.

If node_modules is taggable, use the generated tag to search for an existing archive. If found, skip archiving and uploading. Otherwise, archive and process node_modules using the existing logic if it’s not taggable.

@tianfeng92 tianfeng92 marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 23:52
@tianfeng92 tianfeng92 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2024 23:52
@tianfeng92 tianfeng92 force-pushed the DEVX-3078-tag-node-modules branch from 38c706b to fe9b189 Compare November 8, 2024 00:09
internal/hashio/files.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/hashio/files.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/hashio/files.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/saucecloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/saucecloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/saucecloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/saucecloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
internal/saucecloud/cloud.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tianfeng92 tianfeng92 merged commit 538fcd8 into main Nov 8, 2024
15 checks passed
@tianfeng92 tianfeng92 deleted the DEVX-3078-tag-node-modules branch November 8, 2024 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants