Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: Use OpenPGP instead of PGP #1931

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

ppisar
Copy link
Contributor

@ppisar ppisar commented Dec 5, 2024

"PGP" is a trademark and a name of the original implementation. Contemporary standard (RFC 4880) calls the technology "OpenPGP" instead.

This patch changes a documentation, the comments, and the messages. It keeps function and variable names untouched. Mainly because it would mean breaking API and ABI.

Related: #1917

"PGP" is a trademark and a name of the original implementation.
Contemporary standard (RFC 4880) calls the technology "OpenPGP"
instead.

This patch changes a documentation, the comments, and the messages. It
keeps function and variable names untouched. Mainly because it would
mean breaking API and ABI.

Related: rpm-software-management#1917
Copy link
Member

@evan-goode evan-goode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I agree. OpenPGP is the correct name for the standardized interface, although it may be less familiar to users than "PGP" or "GPG".

@evan-goode
Copy link
Member

I fixed one more occurrence.

@evan-goode evan-goode added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into rpm-software-management:main with commit 363d48a Dec 5, 2024
1 of 17 checks passed
evan-goode added a commit to evan-goode/ci-dnf-stack that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
kontura pushed a commit to rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants