Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistently use ClassicMcEliece for CMCE parameter names #4508

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

randombit
Copy link
Owner

Otherwise we have some places where we have to string match on "mceliece" from the OIDs while others we use "ClassicMcEliece"

Kind of a minor thing but it seems easy to fix (right now, before any of this is in a release)

Copy link
Collaborator

@reneme reneme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point! CI failures seem to stem from missing updates in the KAT files.

Copy link
Collaborator

@FAlbertDev FAlbertDev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see your point. My main concern with this change is that the parameter names do not match with the specification (see NIST Round 4 Spec (chapter 7) and ISO draft (chapter 10)). But I agree that the inconsistency is quite confusing. I'm fine with both variants 👍

@randombit randombit force-pushed the jack/bike-shed-cmce-params branch 2 times, most recently from 0e4527f to 1873d51 Compare January 18, 2025 13:20
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 91.215% (+0.006%) from 91.209%
when pulling 1873d51 on jack/bike-shed-cmce-params
into 91a2620 on master.

@randombit randombit merged commit ea8adfc into master Jan 18, 2025
39 checks passed
@randombit randombit deleted the jack/bike-shed-cmce-params branch January 18, 2025 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants