-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix failing asv benchmarks in CI #2352
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
I think builds are broken until this gets fixed. I have no familiarity with the asv performance benchmarks, so I request someone to look at the results and see if they are still legit. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice PR @markcampanelli !! Minor suggestions about the whatsnew.
* asv 0.4.2 upgraded to asv 0.6.4 to fix CI install failure due to pinned older conda. | ||
(pull:`2352`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* asv 0.4.2 upgraded to asv 0.6.4 to fix CI install failure due to pinned older conda. | |
(pull:`2352`) | |
* asv 0.4.2 upgraded to asv 0.6.4 to fix CI failure due to pinned older conda. | |
(pull:`2352`) |
It sounds weird to me; like if it were the CI what you were installing.
In any case, that's not important. Can you move this to the Testing
section? Or create a new one called Maintenance
? I feel like requirements is more about dependencies an user would normally install.
|
||
|
||
Contributors | ||
~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
* Mark Campanellli (:ghuser:`markcampanelli`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
* Mark Campanellli (:ghuser:`markcampanelli`) | |
* Mark Campanelli (:ghuser:`markcampanelli`) |
Hehe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copy pasta strikes again!
@echedey-ls Thanks for your review. Comments addressed. This should be ready to merge. |
docs/sphinx/source/reference
for API changes.docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew
for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with:issue:`num`
or this Pull Request with:pull:`num`
. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with:ghuser:`user`
).remote-data
) and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.