Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/vrack services tests qpa #14596

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

qpavy
Copy link
Contributor

@qpavy qpavy commented Dec 16, 2024

Question Answer
Branch? feat/vrack-services-tests
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
Breaking change? no
Tickets Fix #MANAGER-16104
License BSD 3-Clause
  • Try to keep pull requests small so they can be easily reviewed.
  • Commits are signed-off
  • [] Only FR translations have been updated
  • Branch is up-to-date with target branch
  • Lint has passed locally
  • Standalone app was ran and tested locally
  • Ticket reference is mentioned in linked commits (internal only)
  • [ ] Breaking change is mentioned in relevant commits

Description

Related

Quentin Pavy added 3 commits December 13, 2024 13:08
ref: MANAGER-16104

Signed-off-by: Quentin Pavy <[email protected]>
ref: MANAGER-16104

Signed-off-by: Quentin Pavy <[email protected]>
ref: MANAGER-16104

Signed-off-by: Quentin Pavy <[email protected]>
@qpavy qpavy requested review from a team as code owners December 16, 2024 12:07
@qpavy qpavy requested review from kqesar, frenautvh, oalkabouss, ghyenne and sachinrameshn and removed request for a team December 16, 2024 12:07
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
6 Security Hotspots
8.7% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@qpavy qpavy merged commit cba800d into feat/vrack-services-tests Dec 16, 2024
11 of 14 checks passed
@qpavy qpavy deleted the feat/vrack-services-tests-qpa branch December 16, 2024 13:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants