-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 488
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
8305418: [Linux] Replace obsolete XIM as Input Method Editor
Reviewed-by: kcr, mfox, lkostyra
- Loading branch information
Thiago Milczarek Sayao
committed
Jan 16, 2025
1 parent
a95151e
commit 069db87
Showing
7 changed files
with
190 additions
and
386 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review
Issues
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/skara tag 25+0
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/skara branch jfx24
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kevinrushforth The tag 25+0 was successfully created.
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kevinrushforth The branch jfx24 was successfully created.
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/skara tag 24+25
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kevinrushforth The tag 24+25 was successfully created.
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/backport jfx17u
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@johanvos Could not automatically backport
069db877
to openjdk/jfx17u due to conflicts in the following files:Please fetch the appropriate branch/commit and manually resolve these conflicts by using the following commands in your personal fork of openjdk/jfx17u. Note: these commands are just some suggestions and you can use other equivalent commands you know.
Once you have resolved the conflicts as explained above continue with creating a pull request towards the openjdk/jfx17u with the title
Backport 069db877e1c6471a108316701c3136b01cc8f18e
.Below you can find a suggestion for the pull request body:
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/backport jfx21u
069db87
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@johanvos Could not automatically backport
069db877
to openjdk/jfx21u due to conflicts in the following files:Please fetch the appropriate branch/commit and manually resolve these conflicts by using the following commands in your personal fork of openjdk/jfx21u. Note: these commands are just some suggestions and you can use other equivalent commands you know.
Once you have resolved the conflicts as explained above continue with creating a pull request towards the openjdk/jfx21u with the title
Backport 069db877e1c6471a108316701c3136b01cc8f18e
.Below you can find a suggestion for the pull request body: