Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Integrate ODRL wizard #314

Open
HLWeil opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Feature Request] Integrate ODRL wizard #314

HLWeil opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature

Comments

@HLWeil
Copy link
Member

HLWeil commented Dec 16, 2024

ODRL

ODRL is a datamodel aimed to represent data access rules (for licensing e.g.). ARCs could also profit from this, as it would allow to fine-tune the access rules on an ARC level. See nfdi4plants/ARC-specification#133 for reference.

Suggested Solution

So I would suggest that the ARCitect could integrate the ODRL wizard, similarly to Swate. It is being hosted on deNBI, so hopefully it should be fairly stable.

I'm not sure about the technical details of integration, though, and we should await the specifics of integration of the ODRL part into the ARC Scaffold specification.

@feserm @JonasLukasczyk @Freymaurer

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Needs Triage This item is up for investigation. label Dec 16, 2024
@feserm
Copy link

feserm commented Dec 16, 2024

Maybe a comment from my side. The ODRL Wizard is a configurable tool. So you could think about hosting your own instance of the frontend to configure it to your needs (what obligations, permissions, prohibitions you want to support). This new instance could still use the externally hosted backend for rendering if needed. But could adjust the user interface to plugin mode, implement custom ARCitect specific logic, etc. This would allow for a more seamless integration of the wizard in the ARCitect.

@JonasLukasczyk JonasLukasczyk self-assigned this Dec 20, 2024
@JonasLukasczyk JonasLukasczyk added Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature and removed Status: Needs Triage This item is up for investigation. labels Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants