Standardize Repo / Solution with nats.net

[rickdotnet]

Addresses #25 .

There's a small deviation from nats.net. The .sln and solution artifacts are in the src folder, instead of the repo root, as they are in nats.net.

@mtmk can you take a look at the ci/cd bits?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.88%. Comparing base (d6934d7) to head (877bec9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #26      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.69%   76.88%   +3.18%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines         844      809      -35     
  Branches       63       63              
==========================================
  Hits          622      622              
+ Misses        197      162      -35     
  Partials       25       25              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mtmk]

@rickdotnet ci/cd looks good and is passing anyway. release workflow looks good and should be fine but we'll have to fix any issues it there are at the time of release.

[rickdotnet]

Not sure if these were there for a reason, but they don't appear to be used. And, since we are moving things around anyways.. figured we could them into the preview that follows the this PR.

[mtmk]

Not sure if these were there for a reason, but they don't appear to be used. And, since we are moving things around anyways.. figured we could them into the preview that follows the this PR.

those are copy paste errors from nats.net project. yea looks like we don't need them.

[mtmk]

LGTM