Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add chainsaw test for policy ordering in authz server #297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

vishal-chdhry
Copy link
Member

Explanation

Add chainsaw test for policy ordering in authz server

Related issue

Proposed Changes

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guidelines.
  • I have read the PR documentation guide and followed the process including adding proof manifests to this PR.
  • This is a bug fix and I have added unit tests that prove my fix is effective.

Further Comments

@vishal-chdhry vishal-chdhry requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 13:34
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 29.07%. Comparing base (1583e5c) to head (122d119).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #297   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   29.07%   29.07%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        1183     1183           
=======================================
  Hits          344      344           
  Misses        791      791           
  Partials       48       48           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

eddycharly
eddycharly previously approved these changes Jan 6, 2025
@vishal-chdhry vishal-chdhry force-pushed the chainsaw-policy-ordering branch from a9ead6d to 122d119 Compare January 6, 2025 13:55
@eddycharly eddycharly merged commit 7c35858 into kyverno:main Jan 6, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants