-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix label and indentation processors #1379
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Unit Tests Summary 1 files 84 suites 1m 22s ⏱️ Results for commit a2f3a8b. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Unit Test Performance Difference
Additional test case details
Results for commit 3765fef ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
if (is.null(row_nms)) { # One row per statistic | ||
common_names <- intersect(names(out), names(indents_in)) | ||
out[common_names] <- indents_in[common_names] | ||
} else if (!is.null(row_nms)) { # One row per combination of variable level and statistic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be better to merge behavior with .adjust_stats_desc_by_in_def
(we can definitely pick a better name ahah)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is something to do for formats and indentation. Are the count cases that provide counts for each level for each stats (I think keeping this structure clear with the stat name on top is the best)
|
||
out | ||
out %>% unlist() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe we want the other .unlist_keep*?
Pull Request
Fixes #1378 #1363