-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test bitte-ci #1106
base: mig-bitte-ci
Are you sure you want to change the base?
test bitte-ci #1106
Conversation
blaggacao
commented
Aug 19, 2021
- Remove .buildkite
- test
passed=$(grep -oP 'Total Tests Run: \d+' "retesteth-$1-log.txt") | ||
failed=$(grep -oP 'TOTAL ERRORS DETECTED: \d+' "retesteth-$1-log.txt") | ||
|
||
cat <<EOF | buildkite-agent annotate --context "retesteth-$1" --style "$style" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any Bitte CI equivalent of this? Since the ETS step currently fails (was marked "softFail" in Buildkite) it would be convenient to be able to see the actual success / failure status.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately not (yet). We are trying to get a PoC running for now. You'll be able to use buildkite in parallel for a while until we can make sure Bitte CI is in a usable shape.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that sounds good 👍
Can you make a bitte / ci-specific version of this file (again)? I'm also making one soon for doing the same thing but locally and it would be good to distinguish these use cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes exactly.
f0c493b
to
c403992
Compare
ac84708
to
6c69c92
Compare
c403992
to
c838722
Compare
70b71b4
to
dbba1a8
Compare
3bc3ac8
to
e0bba70
Compare
63b251f
to
ba1ffa8
Compare
e0bba70
to
d559c02
Compare
d559c02
to
f687ec0
Compare