Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(spec): rename BlockSync to ValueSync #698

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

cason
Copy link
Contributor

@cason cason commented Dec 18, 2024

Closes: #606


PR author checklist

@cason cason added spec Related to specifications sync Synchronization protocols labels Dec 18, 2024
@josef-widder josef-widder self-requested a review December 18, 2024 13:13
Copy link
Member

@josef-widder josef-widder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly just renaming, except beginning of readme file that also explains now that we used the name blocksync in past issues. All looks good.

@cason cason merged commit 2fae91e into main Dec 18, 2024
4 checks passed
@cason cason deleted the cason/606-blocksync-rename branch December 18, 2024 13:27
romac pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
* specs: rename blocksync -> valuesync basedir

* specs: rename blocksync -> valuesync in Markdown

* specs: rename blocksync -> valuesync in Quint

* specs: rename blocksync -> valuesync in Quint vars

* specs: rename blocksync -> valuesync in Quint
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec Related to specifications sync Synchronization protocols
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

chore: Define a more appropriate name for Blocksync protocol
2 participants