New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

return-txn-current-if-exists #432

Open

brucecurcio wants to merge 1 commit into v0.25 from return-txn-current-if-exists

+34 −161

brucecurcio commented Jan 14, 2025

No description provided.

brucecurcio force-pushed the return-txn-current-if-exists branch from e6c3c24 to ad36bbd Compare

January 14, 2025 22:52


          return-txn-current-if-exists

9dd9ac4

brucecurcio force-pushed the return-txn-current-if-exists branch from ad36bbd to 9dd9ac4 Compare

January 14, 2025 22:57

brucecurcio marked this pull request as ready for review

January 14, 2025 22:58

brucecurcio requested a review from davidhankins

January 14, 2025 22:59

akleinib commented Jan 15, 2025

Are these changes still prevent scenarios like:

Caller requested a R-O transaction first then requests a R/W transaction,
Caller requested a R-O transaction with isolation level A first then requests a R-O transaction with isolation level B,
...

?

For those cases we shouldn't return the current transaction if the newly requested transaction doesn't match the characteristics of the existing one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet