Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add rapidsnark vs snarkjs benchmark data #19

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -60,12 +60,9 @@ node tools/request.js <input.json> <circuit>
````
## Benchmark

This prover uses intel assembly with ADX extensions and parallelizes as much as it can the proof generation.

The prover is much faster that snarkjs and faster than bellman.

[TODO] Some comparation tests should be done.

This prover uses intel assembly with ADX extensions and parallelizes as much as it can the proof generation.
- rapidsnark vs snarkjs: an -80% proof generation time and memory consumption reduction was [measured](https://github.com/privacy-scaling-explorations/e2e-zk-ecdsa/tree/main/circuits/circom/benchmark) for a circuit with 3 millions non-linear constraints.
- rapidsnark vs bellman: [TODO]

## License