Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move system view interface, grpc server, and client to stubs_oss files #29291

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

thyton
Copy link
Contributor

@thyton thyton commented Jan 6, 2025

Description

What does this PR do?
This PR refactors dynamic and extended system view interface, its gRPC server, and client to stubs_oss files. The PR prepares for the implementation for the Enterprise internal SDK

Related ENT PR: https://github.com/hashicorp/vault-enterprise/pull/7214
Ticket: VAULT-33084
RFC: https://go.hashi.co/rfc/vlt-337

TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee

  • Backport Labels: If this fix needs to be backported, use the appropriate backport/ label that matches the desired release branch. Note that in the CE repo, the latest release branch will look like backport/x.x.x, but older release branches will be backport/ent/x.x.x+ent.
    • LTS: If this fixes a critical security vulnerability or severity 1 bug, it will also need to be backported to the current LTS versions of Vault. To ensure this, use all available enterprise labels.
  • ENT Breakage: If this PR either 1) removes a public function OR 2) changes the signature
    of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
    applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
    break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
    files.
  • Jira: If this change has an associated Jira, it's referenced either
    in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
  • RFC: If this change has an associated RFC, please link it in the description.
  • ENT PR: If this change has an associated ENT PR, please link it in the
    description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.

@thyton thyton requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 15:43
@thyton thyton requested review from ltcarbonell and removed request for ltcarbonell January 6, 2025 15:43
@github-actions github-actions bot added the hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed label Jan 6, 2025
vault/extended_system_view.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
vault/extended_system_view.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
vault/extended_system_view.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
vault/extended_system_view.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
vault/extended_system_view.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

CI Results:
All required Go tests succeeded but failures were detected ⚠️
Failures:

Test Type Package Test Logs
race command TestProxy_QuitAPI view test results

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Build Results:
All builds succeeded! ✅

@thyton thyton added backport/ent/1.16.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.16.x+ent backport/1.18.x backport/ent/1.17.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.17.x+ent labels Jan 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@helenfufu helenfufu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This refactoring lgtm!

Looks like you were able to find a happy medium with the new ENT interface types, using the BackendConfig, and the stubbing pattern? 🎉

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
// Copyright (c) HashiCorp, Inc.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be BUSL-1.1?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@thyton thyton Jan 6, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, thanks for linking the reference! Though I think I'm confused by what falls under

future releases of HashiCorp products, including HashiCorp Terraform, Vault, Consul, Boundary, Nomad, Waypoint, Packer, and Vagrant

vs.

HashiCorp APIs, SDKs, and almost all other libraries will remain MPL 2.0.

because this is a Vault SDK which seems to satisfy both to me 🤔

vault/dynamic_system_view.go Show resolved Hide resolved
vault/extended_system_view_stubs_oss.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
helenfufu
helenfufu previously approved these changes Jan 6, 2025
helenfufu
helenfufu previously approved these changes Jan 7, 2025
fairclothjm
fairclothjm previously approved these changes Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@fairclothjm fairclothjm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@thyton thyton dismissed stale reviews from fairclothjm and helenfufu via a01edcd January 9, 2025 19:53
@thyton thyton requested a review from helenfufu January 10, 2025 18:11
@thyton thyton merged commit bcd89f8 into main Jan 10, 2025
90 of 92 checks passed
@thyton thyton deleted the thyton/VAULT-33084/add-system-view-stubs branch January 10, 2025 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/ent/1.16.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.16.x+ent backport/ent/1.17.x+ent Changes are backported to 1.17.x+ent backport/1.18.x hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed pr/no-changelog pr/no-milestone
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants