Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
choice randomization: better approximation of JR behaviour, fixes #49 #241
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
choice randomization: better approximation of JR behaviour, fixes #49 #241
Changes from all commits
265d0d5
159f06c
bf0008c
2bda8af
c83fef2
954f9e9
761d7da
9b7ffc9
ea5c499
cb6a021
6628199
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this comment belongs here. It isn't specific to this cast, it's specific to casting to XPath
number
throughout. Fine to leave since we have an issue tracking it, but we'll probably just find it went stale some time after we address the issue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is intended for someone reading the randomization code when trying to figure out why WF and JR still produce different sort orders. If it goes stale (when the issue is resolved) then following the link to the issue will make that apparent. I don't see a big problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't "special case: JR behavior" apply to all of this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really. Some of the behaviour is in the odk spec. The "zero-length-string becomes 0" behaviour was surprising though.