-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Search Extender and tests #2483
Conversation
5d5b139
to
fb1831e
Compare
9dc049a
to
a8fbc4e
Compare
312d180
to
3ce0cff
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't tested this code, but I've been following along with it and I see no glaring issues and in my opinion it's just as easy if not easier to read than the original code.
Awesome, thanks guys! We'll merge this after the 2 dependency search refactor PRs |
Actually looks like this doesn't depend on the search/filter split (or at least I don't believe so), so I'll try merging it tomorrow. That should make review for the search/filter split PR a bit easier since we'll have the search architecture right there to compare. |
3fcfc3e
to
fe2c6fe
Compare
[ci skip] [skip ci]
[ci skip] [skip ci]
[ci skip] [skip ci]
[ci skip] [skip ci]
fe2c6fe
to
eaabd6e
Compare
Part of #1891
Part of flarum/issue-archive#286
Part 3 of #2454
Changes proposed in this pull request:
SimpleFlarumSearch
extender has been addedSearching
and gambits have been deprecatedConfirmed
composer test
).