-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Correctly detect if linker supports noexecstack #4061
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about
separate_arguments()
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In developing this fix I did encounter
separate_arguments
but it seems to do a whole lot of things that are unnecessary here. It is intended for parsing a program's command line arguments and handles quoting and escaping and other things which are not applicable here and would make it slower than just doing the single character replacement we want.However, using just
SHELL:${_flag}
, and not splitting${flag}
into a list, may be a better bet. Flags given as a list are assumed to be independent and subject to deduplication which we would not want here. For example, if-z
foo
were already in the flags and we test for-z
bar
cmake might remove the "duplicate"-z
and end up with the invalid-z
foo
bar
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Performance shouldn't be a concern here.
Rather I'm concerned by :
cmake
list, it would indeed be a problemseparate_arguments()
, which would have the advantage of being a bit more clear about the intention, but possibly a bit less clear about the implementation.