Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove listGroups while building categories #11988

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MrFlashAccount
Copy link
Contributor

@MrFlashAccount MrFlashAccount commented Jan 6, 2025

Pull Request Description

This PR adds new field called groups on the User object to avoid fetching the usergroups list to get the names of the groups.

Important Notes

Checklist

Please ensure that the following checklist has been satisfied before submitting the PR:

  • The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Screenshots/screencasts have been attached, if there are any visual changes. For interactive or animated visual changes, a screencast is preferred.
  • All code follows the
    Scala,
    Java,
    TypeScript,
    and
    Rust
    style guides. In case you are using a language not listed above, follow the Rust style guide.
  • Unit tests have been written where possible.
  • If meaningful changes were made to logic or tests affecting Enso Cloud integration in the libraries,
    or the Snowflake database integration, a run of the Extra Tests has been scheduled.
    • If applicable, it is suggested to paste a link to a successful run of the Extra Tests.

@MrFlashAccount MrFlashAccount self-assigned this Jan 6, 2025
@MrFlashAccount MrFlashAccount added g-dashboard CI: No changelog needed Do not require a changelog entry for this PR. labels Jan 6, 2025
@MrFlashAccount MrFlashAccount marked this pull request as ready for review January 6, 2025 13:06
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

🧪 Storybook is successfully deployed!

📊 Dashboard:

Copy link
Contributor

@somebody1234 somebody1234 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CR ✅

@MrFlashAccount
Copy link
Contributor Author

Re-requesting CR as this PR changed after the latest code review

hubertp and others added 2 commits January 13, 2025 18:35
Previosly we were wrongly relying on the presence of the file. That way,
a bash script meant that NI integration was wrongly used.
This change uses Tika, but it has already been present in other
subprojects so no additional dependency shall be added.

Follow up on #11880.
@@ -4495,10 +4495,12 @@ lazy val `runtime-version-manager` = project
libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
"com.typesafe.scala-logging" %% "scala-logging" % scalaLoggingVersion,
"org.apache.commons" % "commons-compress" % commonsCompressVersion,
"org.apache.tika" % "tika-core" % tikaVersion,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this part of the changeset?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't be. I think it's a bad merge or something. Will fix, thank you!

Copy link
Contributor

@somebody1234 somebody1234 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CR ✅
would like to get confirmation that we want to remove the manage permissions modal though

Copy link
Member

@JaroslavTulach JaroslavTulach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No changes to project-manager, its legal, lib/scala, please.

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No changes to project-manager in this PR please.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this was a bad merge or something

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI: No changelog needed Do not require a changelog entry for this PR. g-dashboard
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants