Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename Manage Functions to Match Simplier Model Names #227

Merged

Conversation

davidvonthenen
Copy link
Contributor

@davidvonthenen davidvonthenen commented Feb 8, 2024

It looks like the Manage function names also needed to be changed to the more minimalist form. This matches the recent changes with the model names in this PR #190. Effectively, this removes "GetProject" from every function name (ie. GetProjectUsageRequest() -> GetUsageRequest()) to make it easier to call functions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified naming for project management functions for better clarity and consistency.
  • Tests
    • Updated unit tests to align with the renamed functions in project management.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted error logging method name for consistency with other naming updates.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on simplifying method names across various classes by removing redundant prefixes related to projects and keys. This change aims to enhance clarity and consistency in naming, making the codebase more intuitive to navigate and understand. The modifications span across unit tests, logging functionalities, and client management, reflecting a streamlined approach to accessing and managing project-related information such as keys, invites, members, usage, and balances.

Changes

File(s) Summary
Deepgram.Tests/.../ManageClientTest.cs Renamed functions by removing "Project" and "Key" prefixes for simplicity. Updated test methods accordingly.
Deepgram/Logger/Log.cs Renamed CreateProjectKeyError to CreateKeyError for clarity.
Deepgram/ManageClient.cs Updated method names by removing "Project" and streamlining terms (e.g., GetProjectKeys to GetKeys, CreateProjectKey to CreateKey). This includes changes for keys, invites, members, usage, and balances.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f54dc7 and e2b2e1e.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (39 hunks)
  • Deepgram/Logger/Log.cs (1 hunks)
  • Deepgram/ManageClient.cs (17 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
Deepgram/Logger/Log.cs (1)
  • 52-52: LGTM!
Deepgram/ManageClient.cs (1)
  • 86-96: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [71-250]

LGTM!

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (1)
  • 291-310: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [153-655]

LGTM!

@davidvonthenen davidvonthenen merged commit 5e4b10c into deepgram:main Feb 8, 2024
4 checks passed
@davidvonthenen davidvonthenen deleted the rename-manage-functions branch February 8, 2024 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants