Implement Analyze Unit Tests and Fix Analyze Func Names

[davidvonthenen]

Addresses Issue: #220

Changes:

• Renames ReadClient -> AnalyzeClient. I had renamed the file but didn't rename the class.
• Renamed TranscribeUrl -> AnalyzeUrl and TranscribeFile -> AnalyzeFile to match other SDKs. Forgot to rename these when I copied the Prerecorded class.
• Implements Unit Tests for AnalyzeClient based on PrerecordedClient implementation
• Misc Clean Up (will be introducing a linter for this soon)

Unit tests all pass!

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Enhanced unit tests for the AnalyzeClient class, covering various scenarios for analyzing URLs and files.
• Refactor
  • Improved code cleanliness in unit test files by adjusting whitespace and removing redundant lines.
• New Features
  • Updated the AnalyzeClient class functionality from transcribing to analyzing files, including renaming relevant methods to reflect this change.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent modifications encompass a series of unit test adjustments in the Deepgram.Tests project and a significant update in the Deepgram namespace, particularly within the AnalyzeClient class. The unit test changes primarily involve code cleanup, such as adding or removing newlines and redundant spaces. More notably, the AnalyzeClient class has shifted its focus from transcribing to analyzing files, with method names and comments updated to reflect this new functionality.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.../ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs	Added unit tests for AnalyzeClient methods, covering API calls and callback settings.
.../ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs	Added a newline before class declaration.
.../ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs	Removed Deepgram.Models.Manage namespace and cleaned up redundant lines in the Projects region.
.../ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs	Code cleanup: Added and removed blank lines for better readability.
.../ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs	Added a newline before class declaration.
Deepgram/AnalyzeClient.cs	Updated functionality from transcribing to analyzing files; method names and comments revised.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f54dc7 and b4a0a87.

Files selected for processing (6)

• Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
• Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
• Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (2 hunks)
• Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (2 hunks)
• Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (1 hunks)
• Deepgram/AnalyzeClient.cs (6 hunks)

Additional comments: 17

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (1)

• 11-11: LGTM!

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs (1)

• 11-11: LGTM!

Deepgram/AnalyzeClient.cs (1)

• 12-44: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [15-131]

LGTM!

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (1)

• 10-10: LGTM!

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (1)

• 1-426: LGTM!

Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (12)

• 3-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The file header correctly includes copyright, license, and SPDX identifier.

• 3-3: The removal of using Deepgram.Models.Manage; aligns with the PR's objective to clean up the codebase.
• 9-9: The class ManageClientTest is well-named, indicating it contains tests for the ManageClient class.
• 3-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [11-17]

The Setup method correctly initializes test prerequisites. Consider using SetUpAttribute consistently across all test classes for uniformity.

• 3-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [19-19]

The Projects region is organized and free of redundant empty lines, adhering to the cleanup objective.

• 3-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [20-20]

Each test method follows a clear Arrange-Act-Assert pattern, enhancing readability and maintainability.

• 3-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [21-21]

Mocking and substituting ManageClient with a custom HttpClientWrapper is correctly implemented, ensuring isolation of tests.

• 22-22: The use of AutoFaker for generating test data is appropriate, reducing boilerplate code and improving test robustness.
• 23-23: Assertions using FluentAssertions provide clear and expressive validation of test outcomes.
• 24-24: The use of AssertionScope allows for multiple assertions within a single test, improving error reporting.
• 25-25: The dynamic construction of URIs using UriSegments constants ensures consistency and reduces the risk of typos.
• 27-27: The cleanup in the Projects region, as mentioned in the summary, is evident and improves the readability of the test file.