Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix #6397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix #6397

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2024

Conversation

UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Nov 16, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

I guess we should make sure that binaries for every possible platform can be built via Guix with no issues even if we do not want to provide "official" binaries for it.

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 22 milestone Nov 16, 2024
PastaPastaPasta
PastaPastaPasta approved these changes Nov 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, LGTM c5d5b14

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 requested a review from knst November 18, 2024 10:53
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit 8fa1c24 into dashpay:develop Nov 18, 2024
33 checks passed
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta @knst
Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix
aada8a5 
c5d5b14 ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  I guess we should make sure that binaries for every possible platform can be built via Guix with no issues even if we do not want to provide "official" binaries for it.

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 6464b68a47e680bb379c82842599200d6917adb8f1493fa75ac80ddc7a6fea92a9190215cfa3f32b0bd88e2dd0425d4eb13846ea2d7e19e144afff9c1171ff13
knst pushed a commit to knst/dash that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta @knst
Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix
7ca5663 
c5d5b14 ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  I guess we should make sure that binaries for every possible platform can be built via Guix with no issues even if we do not want to provide "official" binaries for it.

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 6464b68a47e680bb379c82842599200d6917adb8f1493fa75ac80ddc7a6fea92a9190215cfa3f32b0bd88e2dd0425d4eb13846ea2d7e19e144afff9c1171ff13
PastaPastaPasta added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge #6432: [v22.0.x] backport: release v22.0.0-rc2
a6ee725 
8b88ff7 Merge #6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta)
02ad523 Merge #6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta)
3bbcd3d Merge #6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta)
18f636f Merge #6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta)
9fed456 Merge #6407: fix: dataraces (pasta)
86105da Merge #6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta)
a1f7e96 Merge #6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta)
90a3807 Merge #6402: ci: cache built (pasta)
66f6787 Merge #6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta)
7ca5663 Merge #6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## What was done?
  See commits for each particular change

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  To be deployed on testnet

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 8b88ff7
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 8b88ff7

Tree-SHA512: f7fac62996873503e7de875cc96d9cdf5675674345f1bb1df4a16bf19bddc17bc395a80cc761363a0121022d42c46fb313b0973b9cc71f568ef55c6b3d9e29d8
PastaPastaPasta added a commit to PastaPastaPasta/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2024
@PastaPastaPasta
Merge dashpay#6484: chore: Merge master 22.0.0 back into develop
779e429 
1c7bfcb chore: set release true (pasta)
c90339e Merge dashpay#6459: docs: add release notes for v22.0.0 (pasta)
a6f1fc5 Merge dashpay#6475: chore: bumped chain assumed sizes based on latest usage (pasta)
d7cd9f1 Merge dashpay#6464: chore: update man pages for v22 (pasta)
212f91c Merge dashpay#6461: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta)
9a8b685 Merge dashpay#6460: chore: Translations 2024-12 (pasta)
2f71f4d Merge dashpay#6458: chore: bump MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION to latest proto (pasta)
fa29ed5 Merge dashpay#6456: fix(qt): allow refreshing wallet data without crashing (pasta)
758cd64 Merge dashpay#6452: fix: store ready queues on the mixing masternode (pasta)
395447b Merge dashpay#6451: depends: update 'src/dashbls' to dashpay/bls-signatures@7e747e8a as 62fa665 (pasta)
c7b0d80 Merge dashpay#6441: fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (pasta)
c074e09 Merge dashpay#6444: fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter (pasta)
cb04114 Merge dashpay#6442: fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (pasta)
db5b53a Merge dashpay#6434: fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (pasta)
8b88ff7 Merge dashpay#6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta)
02ad523 Merge dashpay#6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta)
3bbcd3d Merge dashpay#6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta)
18f636f Merge dashpay#6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta)
9fed456 Merge dashpay#6407: fix: dataraces (pasta)
86105da Merge dashpay#6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta)
a1f7e96 Merge dashpay#6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta)
90a3807 Merge dashpay#6402: ci: cache built (pasta)
66f6787 Merge dashpay#6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta)
7ca5663 Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  ## What was done?
  Suppressed changes from 1c7bfcb and resolved merge conflicts.

  ```
  Auto-merging .github/workflows/build.yml
  Auto-merging configure.ac
  Auto-merging src/chainparams.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.h
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.cpp
  Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.h
  Auto-merging src/evo/specialtxman.cpp
  Auto-merging src/init.cpp
  Auto-merging src/net_processing.cpp
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/net_processing.cpp
  Auto-merging src/net_processing.h
  Auto-merging src/qt/transactiontablemodel.cpp
  Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.cpp
  Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.h
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/wallet/wallet.h
  Auto-merging test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py
  CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py
  ```

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d108579; no diff to develop

Tree-SHA512: 3f063011224880fee35edb04ce265dff33a52273c3d45ef1dbcebcecb22c25d8ad7c91b83514f36142716a6fbd0ddd3a8a3f2a9b59ce78ce975bbce69a2a13b5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta approved these changes

@knst knst Awaiting requested review from knst

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
22
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@UdjinM6 @PastaPastaPasta