forked from solana-labs/solana
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
accounts-db: relax intrabatch account locks #4253
Draft
2501babe
wants to merge
21
commits into
anza-xyz:master
Choose a base branch
from
2501babe:20250103_simd83locking
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
+668
−216
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2501babe
force-pushed
the
20250103_simd83locking
branch
from
January 3, 2025 10:46
3e016b3
to
f748a5f
Compare
2501babe
force-pushed
the
20250103_simd83locking
branch
4 times, most recently
from
January 7, 2025 11:23
2fb8527
to
11d1dcb
Compare
2501babe
changed the title
accounts-db: only lock accounts across threads
accounts-db: disable intrabatch account locks
Jan 7, 2025
talalim
reviewed
Jan 8, 2025
apfitzge
reviewed
Jan 8, 2025
// HANA TODO the vec allocation here is unfortunate but hard to avoid | ||
// we cannot do this in one closure because of borrow rules | ||
// play around with alternate strategies, according to benches this may be up to | ||
// 50% slower for small batches and few locks, but for large batches and many locks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bench using jemalloc? i'd think it would do a reasonable job of just keeping the mem in thread-local cache for re-use
2501babe
force-pushed
the
20250103_simd83locking
branch
from
January 13, 2025 12:13
95b17b3
to
d1ec289
Compare
2501babe
changed the title
accounts-db: disable intrabatch account locks
accounts-db: relax intrabatch account locks
Jan 13, 2025
2501babe
force-pushed
the
20250103_simd83locking
branch
from
January 14, 2025 12:27
61a81eb
to
7280007
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
aka "simd83 account locking"
TODO confirm it behaves right with the feature on, dedupe transactions via messagehash, write tests
Problem
Summary of Changes
Fixes #