chore(deps): update devdependencies

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending	OpenSSF
@storybook/addon-a11y (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/addon-essentials (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/addon-interactions (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/addon-links (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/addon-themes (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/blocks (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/manager-api (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/nextjs (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/react (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/test (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@storybook/theming (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4
@types/node (source)	devDependencies	patch	20.16.6 -> 20.16.9	20.16.10
@types/react (source)	devDependencies	patch	18.3.8 -> 18.3.9	18.3.10
chromatic (source)	devDependencies	patch	11.10.3 -> 11.10.4
prisma (source)	devDependencies	minor	5.19.1 -> 5.20.0
storybook (source)	devDependencies	patch	8.3.2 -> 8.3.3	8.3.4

---

Release Notes

storybookjs/storybook (@​storybook/addon-a11y)

v8.3.3

Compare Source

• CLI: Show constraints in error when getting depndencies - #​29187, thanks @​andrasczeh!
• React-Vite: Downgrade react-docgen-typescript plugin - #​29184, thanks @​shilman!
• UI: Fix composed storybook TooltipLinkList bug where href isn't passed forward - #​29175, thanks @​JSMike!

chromaui/chromatic-cli (chromatic)

v11.10.4

Compare Source

🐛 Bug Fix

• Revert "Use --stats-json flag for SB 8.0.0+" #​1058 (@​jmhobbs)
• Enable unicorn/prefer-spread ESLint rule #​1052 (@​codykaup)
• Enable unicorn/better-regex ESLint rule #​1055 (@​codykaup)

Authors: 2

• Cody Kaup (@​codykaup)
• John Hobbs (@​jmhobbs)

---

prisma/prisma (prisma)

v5.20.0

Compare Source

🌟 Help us spread the word about Prisma by starring the repo or posting on X about the release. 🌟

Highlights

strictUndefinedChecks in Preview

With Prisma ORM 5.20.0, the Preview feature strictUndefinedChecks will disallow any value that is explicitly undefined and will be a runtime error. This change is direct feedback from this GitHub issue and follows our latest proposal on the same issue.

To demonstrate the change, take the following code snippet:

prisma.table.deleteMany({
  where: {
    // If `nullableThing` is nullish, this query will remove all data.
    email: nullableThing?.property,
  }
})

In Prisma ORM 5.19.0 and below, this could result in unintended behavior. In Prisma ORM 5.20.0, if the strictUndefinedChecks Preview feature is enabled, you will get a runtime error instead:

Invalid \`prisma.user.findMany()\` invocation in
/client/tests/functional/strictUndefinedChecks/test.ts:0:0
  XX })
  XX 
  XX test('throws on undefined input field', async () => {
→ XX   const result = prisma.user.deleteMany({
         where: {
           email: undefined
                  ~~~~~~~~~
         }
       })
Invalid value for argument \`where\`: explicitly \`undefined\` values are not allowed."

We have also introduced the Prisma.skip symbol, which will allow you to get the previous behavior if desired.

prisma.table.findMany({
  where: {
    // Use Prisma.skip to skip parts of the query
    email: nullableEmail ?? Prisma.skip
  }
})

From Prisma ORM 5.20.0 onward, we recommend enabling strictUndefinedChecks, along with the TypeScript compiler option exactOptionalPropertyTypes, which will help catch cases of undefined values at compile time. Together, these two changes will help protect your Prisma queries from potentially destructive behavior.

strictUndefinedChecks will be a valid Preview feature for the remainder of Prisma ORM 5. With our next major version, this behavior will become the default and the Preview feature will be “graduated” to Generally Available.

If you have any questions or feedback about strictUndefinedChecks, please ask/comment in our dedicated Preview feature GitHub discussion.

typedSql bug fix

Thank you to everyone who has tried out our typedSql Preview feature and provided feedback! This release has a quick fix for typescript files generated when Prisma Schema enums had hyphens.

Fixes and improvements

Prisma

• Prisma incorrectly parses CRDB's FK constraint error as not available.
• Invalid TypeScript files created by generate when typedSql is enabled and enum contains hyphens.
• @prisma/internals didn't list ts-toolbelt in dependencies.
• using $extends prevents model comments from being passed to TypeScript

Prisma Engines

• Planetscale engine tests: interactive_tx
• Fix broken engine size publishing workflow

Credits

Huge thanks to @​mcuelenaere, @​pagewang0, @​key-moon, @​pranayat, @​yubrot, @​thijmenjk, @​mydea, @​HRM, @​haaawk, @​baileywickham, @​brian-dlee, @​nickcarnival, @​eruditmorina, @​nzakas, and @​gutyerrez for helping!

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am" (UTC), Automerge - "before 4am" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
screamer	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Sep 29, 2024 3:25am

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 23.44%. Comparing base (cde71d7) to head (19d564b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #285   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   23.44%   23.44%           
=======================================
  Files          53       53           
  Lines         499      499           
  Branches       69       69           
=======================================
  Hits          117      117           
  Misses        362      362           
  Partials       20       20           

Flag	Coverage Δ
jest	16.83% <ø> (ø)
storybook	93.02% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.