Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RPP Rain augmentation on HOST and HIP #463

Merged
merged 50 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

r-abishek
Copy link
Member

@r-abishek r-abishek commented Oct 23, 2024

  • Adds to version to RPP 1.9.10
  • Adds a dash-cam rain augmentation on HOST and HIP
  • Adds support for U8/F16/F32/I8 bit depths with NCHW/NHWC tensor support
  • Adds relevant unit/perf tests

@r-abishek r-abishek requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 05:45
@kiritigowda kiritigowda requested a review from rrawther October 29, 2024 20:22
@kiritigowda kiritigowda self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
@kiritigowda kiritigowda added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 29, 2024
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kiritigowda
Copy link
Collaborator

@r-abishek - needs conflicts resolved

@kiritigowda kiritigowda marked this pull request as draft December 23, 2024 20:28
RPP Rain - Resolved Merge Conflicts
@kiritigowda kiritigowda marked this pull request as ready for review December 30, 2024 22:46
@@ -432,6 +432,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if(testCase == 28)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should use ENUM for test case instead of hardcoded values for better code readability

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed with #499

Copy link
Contributor

@spolifroni-amd spolifroni-amd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The points in the changed section need to be changed so they have more info (what was it before; what is it now; what, if anything, does the user need to do)

But I don't want to hold up the review process so I'll OK this as is and we can change it later.

@kiritigowda
Copy link
Collaborator

@r-abishek can you look at the conflicts

@r-abishek
Copy link
Member Author

@kiritigowda Could we merge this PR?
Conflicts resolved, Azure passing.

@kiritigowda kiritigowda merged commit d2fdd62 into ROCm:develop Jan 15, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci:precheckin enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants