Turn shuffle option on in soca -> cice. #60
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This turns on shuffle option in soca -> cice and changes
seaice edge
to 40%.For all background ice concentrations <
seaice edge
when shuffle is on, the code finds a nearest background point whose total ice concentration is closest to the soca analysis total ice concentration, and copies that background ice profile as the new analysis at the current point. For all background ice concentrations >seaice edge
ice concentrations are rescaled, and some ice fields recomputed.Some results from a first cycle of high res experiment:
Background:
soca analysis (no postprocessing; I am cutting off values outside of [0, 1] when plotting):
analysis after Soca2Cice on develop (where
shuffle
is off, andseaice edge
for the arctic is 0.8) As expected, the analysis looks like background for ice concentrations < 0.8analysis after Soca2Cice in this branch (
shuffle
is on,seaice edge
is set to 0.4). Note that these results are with JCSDA-internal/soca#1108This branch can be merged in develop regardless of JCSDA-internal/soca#1108, since gdasapp soca hash already includes the bugfix that allows
shuffle
to be turned on. However, I would recommend running experiments that include JCSDA-internal/soca#1108 which further improves on shuffle.I ran C384mx025_3DVarAOWCDA for 2 cycles with this setup, and forecasts succeeded (cice was OK with these analyses). We'll do better evaluation when we run the next marine candidate experiment.