Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code review 2 - DON'T MERGE #32

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hajush
Copy link
Contributor

@hajush hajush commented Mar 30, 2017

No description provided.

@@ -32,6 +32,9 @@ const Pet = require('../models/pet');
const petRoutes = require('../routes/petRoutes');
//End

// Best not to expose all your React components here, only the files you want
// to serve up without transpilation. You can move the index.html and style.css
// to a folder (maybe 'public'), and express.static only those two files. - Harold
app.use(express.static('src'));

app.use(require('webpack-dev-middleware')(compiler, {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd love to hear more about the filter on your DisplayPets constructor.

@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
// seems to work using import. good to resolve any remaining issues.
// Please only include the needed helper code now - not sure what is still being used
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean delete the Runner files that I used to test before we moved the functions to srcServer?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can keep the runner files if they help you test - but maybe rename them to testScrapeRunner.js and testSyncRunner.js.

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
// This isn't safe - let's move this to an environment variable
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure what you mean? Store the secret in a variable?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup - instead of putting your secret on a public github file (configAuth.js), you could put it in an environment variable the way we manage PORT and MONGODB_URI in the srcServer.js file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants