Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor locks.py #631

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

Refactor locks.py #631

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

cvicentiu
Copy link
Member

  1. Introduce a new yml file that stores worker locks counts.
  2. Remove redundant and inconsistent naming between lock name and worker name.

NOTE: I HAVE NOT TESTED THIS PR.

@cvicentiu cvicentiu force-pushed the refactor-2 branch 4 times, most recently from 7b8f1a6 to 53168b9 Compare November 26, 2024 07:32
locks.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@cvicentiu cvicentiu force-pushed the refactor-2 branch 2 times, most recently from c3573ea to 99aadb2 Compare January 6, 2025 19:13
1. Introduce a new yml file that stores worker locks counts.
2. Remove redundant and inconsistent naming between lock name and worker
   name.

NOTE: the worker_locks.yaml is temporary, as the plan is to move away
from DockerLatentWorker and then the notion of locks will become
redundant.
@RazvanLiviuVarzaru RazvanLiviuVarzaru merged commit 9aa4446 into dev Jan 7, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants