Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve performance of
setproperties
/getproperties
for structs with unions #91Improve performance of
setproperties
/getproperties
for structs with unions #91Changes from 14 commits
31be9d6
f4cfd34
ac65fcd
812884d
20fc674
c73435f
9e83da3
1b8840b
d13e05f
7422355
10f40d9
a7abddc
d072e3f
69662e7
8ea24ec
b711a1c
5fb5633
94c6636
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getfield
instead? as the function is namedsetfields_object
hereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous implementation used
getproperty
, I thought best to stay in line with it. Notably, the edge cases where we can't distinguish overloaded properties from fields is handled the same way as before.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, the field/property handling in the package should be improved even further in the future, but I agree that for now the minimal change is best