Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Rewrite based on NamedDimsArrays #1608

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

mtfishman
Copy link
Member

@mtfishman mtfishman commented Dec 17, 2024

Rewrite based on NamedDimsArrays.jl.

In the new design, the ITensor type is a subtype of NamedDimsArrays.AbstractNamedDimsArray with an associated dimension name object (the IndexName, which contains the metadata for the Index type which stores the name and range of values of the dimension).

Most of the actual implementation will be in NamedDimsArrays.jl, BlockSparseArrays.jl, TensorAlgebra.jl, etc.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.00%. Comparing base (7faad33) to head (c848322).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1608      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.61%   85.00%   +7.38%     
==========================================
  Files          69        1      -68     
  Lines        5222       20    -5202     
==========================================
- Hits         4053       17    -4036     
+ Misses       1169        3    -1166     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 80.00% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of ITensor/ITensorBase.jl#1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant