Add autodocs page to documentation

[lkdvos]

Here I added the setup for including a page with all docstrings at the end of the documentation. As I would assume this is something that most packages will want to do anyways, I think it might be convenient to immediately set that up in the skeleton.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 6.02%. Comparing base (88679b0) to head (719235d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #43   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   6.02%   6.02%           
=====================================
  Files          1       1           
  Lines         83      83           
=====================================
  Hits           5       5           
  Misses        78      78           

Flag	Coverage Δ
docs	0.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mtfishman]

Makes sense, thanks. Should we update https://github.com/ITensor/ITensorPkgSkeleton.jl/blob/main/docs/make.jl correspondingly (I see reference.md lists them individually but it looks like we could just use autodocs instead)?

[lkdvos]

Agreed.
As a side note, I made everything "Library" right now, but I honestly would prefer to call this "Index", but that conflicts with the index.md we have set up right now (which I would maybe rename to home.md instead?). I'm definitely not hung up on this, just something to consider.

[mtfishman]

Agreed. As a side note, I made everything "Library" right now, but I honestly would prefer to call this "Index", but that conflicts with the index.md we have set up right now (which I would maybe rename to home.md instead?). I'm definitely not hung up on this, just something to consider.

I'd be good with ["Home" => "home.md", "Index" => "index.md"] (as long as "index.md" isn't treated as special in some other way by Documenter.jl?).

[lkdvos]

Oh you are right, indeed Documenter.jl treats that as the landing page, I did not consider that. In that case, it's probably ok as is.

[mtfishman]

What do you think of "Reference" as opposed to "Library"?

[lkdvos]

I renamed and rebased on the latest changes. I can still bump to v0.2.2 if you prefer, but probably here it's okay to have both changes in a single patch

[mtfishman]

here it's okay to have both changes in a single patch

Agreed.