Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable fast charge #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: ads-7.0.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dutchman1990
Copy link

Might help to reduce recharge time.

Might help to reduce recharge time.
@@ -1683,6 +1683,7 @@ CONFIG_CHARGER_SMB347=y
# CONFIG_CHARGER_GPIO is not set
CONFIG_BATTERY_BQ27541=y
# CONFIG_TEGRA_BPC_MGMT is not set
CONFIG_FORCE_FAST_CHARGE=y
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm I doubt this config parameter is supported by the tegra kernel, but I'll investigate

@Charles-IV
Copy link

I've just tried this, and according to the Fast Charge app by Chris Conley and Mathew Winters, the kernel still doesn't have fast charge support. I imagine something else is needed

@AndDiSa
Copy link
Owner

AndDiSa commented Feb 13, 2017

There is no fastcharge support for the tegra kernel / Nexus 7. Charging is automatically adjusted up to 900mA on USB ports and 1800mA on a charger. Unfortunately the AICL of the charger chip (smb347) is very sensible and is limiting the current as soon as the voltage drops ... According to 3C battery my highest thoughput was 1050mA in the last weeks. In the average I am getting 600-700mA ...
If you would like to dig in a bit deeper, I suggest you to read https://forum.xda-https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2126185 and https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2065404

@Charles-IV
Copy link

I would have imagined that this would have done 'USB fast charging', which is what i think the apps were talking about, removing the 900mA - although i thought it was 500mA - threshhold.

AndDiSa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2017
An inactive timer's base can refer to a offline cpu's base.

In the current code, cpu_base's lock is blindly reinitialized each
time a CPU is brought up. If a CPU is brought online during the period
that another thread is trying to modify an inactive timer on that CPU
with holding its timer base lock, then the lock will be reinitialized
under its feet. This leads to following SPIN_BUG().

<0> BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#3, kworker/u:3/1466
<0> lock: 0xe3ebe000, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/u:3/1466, .owner_cpu: 1
<4> [<c0013dc4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc)
<4> [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc) from [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30)
<4> [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30) from [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310)
<4> [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310) from [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120)
<4> [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120) from [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c)
<4> [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c) from [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48)
<4> [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48) from [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0)
<4> [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0) from [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc)
<4> [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc) from [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4)
<4> [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4) from [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484)
<4> [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484) from [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0)
<4> [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0) from [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c)
<4> [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c) from [<c000ea80>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

As an example, this particular crash occurred when CPU #3 is executing
mod_timer() on an inactive timer whose base is refered to offlined CPU
#2.  The code locked the timer_base corresponding to CPU #2. Before it
could proceed, CPU #2 came online and reinitialized the spinlock
corresponding to its base. Thus now CPU #3 held a lock which was
reinitialized. When CPU #3 finally ended up unlocking the old cpu_base
corresponding to CPU #2, we hit the above SPIN_BUG().

CPU #0		CPU #3				       CPU #2
------		-------				       -------
.....		 ......				      <Offline>
		mod_timer()
		 lock_timer_base
		   spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock)

cpu_up(2)	 .....				        ......
							init_timers_cpu()
....		 .....				    	spin_lock_init(&base->lock)
.....		   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock)  ......
		   <spin_bug>

Allocation of per_cpu timer vector bases is done only once under
"tvec_base_done[]" check. In the current code, spinlock_initialization
of base->lock isn't under this check. When a CPU is up each time the
base lock is reinitialized. Move base spinlock initialization under
the check.

Signed-off-by: Tirupathi Reddy <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
AirOne70 pushed a commit to AirOne70/android_kernel_asus_grouper that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2017
An inactive timer's base can refer to a offline cpu's base.

In the current code, cpu_base's lock is blindly reinitialized each
time a CPU is brought up. If a CPU is brought online during the period
that another thread is trying to modify an inactive timer on that CPU
with holding its timer base lock, then the lock will be reinitialized
under its feet. This leads to following SPIN_BUG().

<0> BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#3, kworker/u:3/1466
<0> lock: 0xe3ebe000, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/u:3/1466, .owner_cpu: 1
<4> [<c0013dc4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc)
<4> [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc) from [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30)
<4> [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30) from [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310)
<4> [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310) from [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120)
<4> [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120) from [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c)
<4> [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c) from [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48)
<4> [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48) from [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0)
<4> [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0) from [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc)
<4> [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc) from [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4)
<4> [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4) from [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484)
<4> [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484) from [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0)
<4> [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0) from [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c)
<4> [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c) from [<c000ea80>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

As an example, this particular crash occurred when CPU AndDiSa#3 is executing
mod_timer() on an inactive timer whose base is refered to offlined CPU
AndDiSa#2.  The code locked the timer_base corresponding to CPU AndDiSa#2. Before it
could proceed, CPU AndDiSa#2 came online and reinitialized the spinlock
corresponding to its base. Thus now CPU AndDiSa#3 held a lock which was
reinitialized. When CPU AndDiSa#3 finally ended up unlocking the old cpu_base
corresponding to CPU AndDiSa#2, we hit the above SPIN_BUG().

CPU #0		CPU AndDiSa#3				       CPU AndDiSa#2
------		-------				       -------
.....		 ......				      <Offline>
		mod_timer()
		 lock_timer_base
		   spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock)

cpu_up(2)	 .....				        ......
							init_timers_cpu()
....		 .....				    	spin_lock_init(&base->lock)
.....		   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock)  ......
		   <spin_bug>

Allocation of per_cpu timer vector bases is done only once under
"tvec_base_done[]" check. In the current code, spinlock_initialization
of base->lock isn't under this check. When a CPU is up each time the
base lock is reinitialized. Move base spinlock initialization under
the check.

Signed-off-by: Tirupathi Reddy <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
AndDiSa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2018
commit 633e8799ddc09431be2744c4a1efdbda13af2b0b upstream.

This changed is needed to avoid locking problem during
boot as shown:

<5>[    8.824096] Registering SWP/SWPB emulation handler
<6>[    8.977294] clock: disabling unused clocks to save power
<3>[    9.108154] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel_albert/kernel/mutex.c:269
<3>[    9.122894] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0
<4>[    9.130249] 3 locks held by swapper/0/1:
<4>[    9.134613]  #0:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c0342430>] __driver_attach+0x58/0xa8
<4>[    9.144500]  #1:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c0342440>] __driver_attach+0x68/0xa8
<4>[    9.154357]  #2:  (&polling_timer){......}, at: [<c0053770>] run_timer_softirq+0x108/0x3ec
<4>[    9.163726] Backtrace:
<4>[    9.166473] [<c001269c>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x114) from [<c067e5f0>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
<4>[    9.175811]  r6:00203230 r5:0000010d r4:d782e000 r3:60000113
<4>[    9.182250] [<c067e5d0>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x24) from [<c007441c>] (__might_sleep+0x10c/0x128)
<4>[    9.191650] [<c0074310>] (__might_sleep+0x0/0x128) from [<c0688f60>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x34/0x36c)
<4>[    9.201660]  r5:c02d5350 r4:d79a0c64
<4>[    9.205688] [<c0688f2c>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x0/0x36c) from [<c02d5350>] (regulator_set_current_limit+0x30/0x118)
<4>[    9.217071] [<c02d5320>] (regulator_set_current_limit+0x0/0x118) from [<c0435ce0>] (update_charger+0x84/0xc4)
<4>[    9.228027]  r7:d782fb20 r6:00000101 r5:c1767e94 r4:00000000
<4>[    9.234436] [<c0435c5c>] (update_charger+0x0/0xc4) from [<c0435d40>] (psy_changed+0x20/0x48)
<4>[    9.243804]  r5:d782e000 r4:c1767e94
<4>[    9.247802] [<c0435d20>] (psy_changed+0x0/0x48) from [<c0435dec>] (polling_timer_func+0x84/0xb8)
<4>[    9.257537]  r4:c1767e94 r3:00000002
<4>[    9.261566] [<c0435d68>] (polling_timer_func+0x0/0xb8) from [<c00537e4>] (run_timer_softirq+0x17c/0x3ec)
<4>[    9.272033]  r4:c1767eb0 r3:00000000
<4>[    9.276062] [<c0053668>] (run_timer_softirq+0x0/0x3ec) from [<c004b000>] (__do_softirq+0xf0/0x298)
<4>[    9.286010] [<c004af10>] (__do_softirq+0x0/0x298) from [<c004b650>] (irq_exit+0x98/0xa0)
<4>[    9.295013] [<c004b5b8>] (irq_exit+0x0/0xa0) from [<c000edbc>] (handle_IRQ+0x60/0xc0)
<4>[    9.303680]  r4:c1194e98 r3:c00bc778
<4>[    9.307708] [<c000ed5c>] (handle_IRQ+0x0/0xc0) from [<c0008504>] (gic_handle_irq+0x34/0x68)
<4>[    9.316955]  r8:000ac383 r7:d782fc3c r6:d782fc08 r5:c11936c4 r4:e0802100
<4>[    9.324310] r3:c026ba48
<4>[    9.327301] [<c00084d0>] (gic_handle_irq+0x0/0x68) from [<c068c2c0>] (__irq_svc+0x40/0x74)
<4>[    9.336456] Exception stack(0xd782fc08 to 0xd782fc50)
<4>[    9.342041] fc00:                   d6e30e6c ac383627 00000000 ac383417 ea19c000 ea200000
<4>[    9.351104] fc20: beffffff 00000667 000ac383 d6e30670 d6e3066c d782fc94 d782fbe8 d782fc50
<4>[    9.360168] fc40: c026ba48 c001d1f0 00000113 ffffffff

Fixes: b299804 ("[BATTERY] pda_power platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Brandon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Drop changes in otg_handle_notification()
 - Adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
AndDiSa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2018
millosr pushed a commit to millosr/android_kernel_asus_grouper that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2018
An inactive timer's base can refer to a offline cpu's base.

In the current code, cpu_base's lock is blindly reinitialized each
time a CPU is brought up. If a CPU is brought online during the period
that another thread is trying to modify an inactive timer on that CPU
with holding its timer base lock, then the lock will be reinitialized
under its feet. This leads to following SPIN_BUG().

<0> BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#3, kworker/u:3/1466
<0> lock: 0xe3ebe000, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/u:3/1466, .owner_cpu: 1
<4> [<c0013dc4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x11c) from [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc)
<4> [<c026e794>] (do_raw_spin_unlock+0x40/0xcc) from [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30)
<4> [<c076c160>] (_raw_spin_unlock+0x8/0x30) from [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310)
<4> [<c009b858>] (mod_timer+0x294/0x310) from [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120)
<4> [<c00a5e04>] (queue_delayed_work_on+0x104/0x120) from [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c)
<4> [<c04eae00>] (sdhci_msm_bus_voting+0x88/0x9c) from [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48)
<4> [<c04d8780>] (sdhci_disable+0x40/0x48) from [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0)
<4> [<c04bf300>] (mmc_release_host+0x4c/0xb0) from [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc)
<4> [<c04c7aac>] (mmc_sd_detect+0x90/0xfc) from [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4)
<4> [<c04c2504>] (mmc_rescan+0x7c/0x2c4) from [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484)
<4> [<c00a6a7c>] (process_one_work+0x27c/0x484) from [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0)
<4> [<c00a6e94>] (worker_thread+0x210/0x3b0) from [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c)
<4> [<c00aad9c>] (kthread+0x80/0x8c) from [<c000ea80>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

As an example, this particular crash occurred when CPU AndDiSa#3 is executing
mod_timer() on an inactive timer whose base is refered to offlined CPU
AndDiSa#2.  The code locked the timer_base corresponding to CPU AndDiSa#2. Before it
could proceed, CPU AndDiSa#2 came online and reinitialized the spinlock
corresponding to its base. Thus now CPU AndDiSa#3 held a lock which was
reinitialized. When CPU AndDiSa#3 finally ended up unlocking the old cpu_base
corresponding to CPU AndDiSa#2, we hit the above SPIN_BUG().

CPU #0		CPU AndDiSa#3				       CPU AndDiSa#2
------		-------				       -------
.....		 ......				      <Offline>
		mod_timer()
		 lock_timer_base
		   spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock)

cpu_up(2)	 .....				        ......
							init_timers_cpu()
....		 .....				    	spin_lock_init(&base->lock)
.....		   spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock)  ......
		   <spin_bug>

Allocation of per_cpu timer vector bases is done only once under
"tvec_base_done[]" check. In the current code, spinlock_initialization
of base->lock isn't under this check. When a CPU is up each time the
base lock is reinitialized. Move base spinlock initialization under
the check.

Signed-off-by: Tirupathi Reddy <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
AndDiSa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2019
commit 1f9c6e1bc1ba5f8a10fcd6e99d170954d7c6d382 upstream.

There were several bugs here.

1)  The done label was in the wrong place so we didn't copy any
    information out when there was no command given.

2)  We were using PAGE_SIZE as the size of the buffer instead of
    "PAGE_SIZE - pos".

3)  snprintf() returns the number of characters that would have been
    printed if there were enough space.  If there was not enough space
    (and we had fixed the memory corruption bug #2) then it would result
    in an information leak when we do simple_read_from_buffer().  I've
    changed it to use scnprintf() instead.

I also removed the initialization at the start of the function, because
I thought it made the code a little more clear.

Fixes: 5e6e3a9 ('wireless: mwifiex: initial commit for Marvell mwifiex driver')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Amitkumar Karwar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <[email protected]>
AndDiSa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 2d3a8e2deddea6c89961c422ec0c5b851e648c14 ]

In blkdev_get() we call __blkdev_get() to do some internal jobs and if
there is some errors in __blkdev_get(), the bdput() is called which
means we have released the refcount of the bdev (actually the refcount of
the bdev inode). This means we cannot access bdev after that point. But
acctually bdev is still accessed in blkdev_get() after calling
__blkdev_get(). This results in use-after-free if the refcount is the
last one we released in __blkdev_get(). Let's take a look at the
following scenerio:

  CPU0            CPU1                    CPU2
blkdev_open     blkdev_open           Remove disk
                  bd_acquire
		  blkdev_get
		    __blkdev_get      del_gendisk
					bdev_unhash_inode
  bd_acquire          bdev_get_gendisk
    bd_forget           failed because of unhashed
	  bdput
	              bdput (the last one)
		        bdev_evict_inode

	  	    access bdev => use after free

[  459.350216] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.351190] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88806c815a80 by task syz-executor.0/20132
[  459.352347]
[  459.352594] CPU: 0 PID: 20132 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.90 #2
[  459.353628] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[  459.354947] Call Trace:
[  459.355337]  dump_stack+0x111/0x19e
[  459.355879]  ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.356523]  print_address_description+0x60/0x223
[  459.357248]  ? __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.357887]  kasan_report.cold+0xae/0x2d8
[  459.358503]  __lock_acquire+0x24c1/0x31b0
[  459.359120]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40
[  459.359784]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x37b/0x580
[  459.360465]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x40
[  459.361123]  ? finish_task_switch+0x125/0x600
[  459.361812]  ? finish_task_switch+0xee/0x600
[  459.362471]  ? mark_held_locks+0xf0/0xf0
[  459.363108]  ? __schedule+0x96f/0x21d0
[  459.363716]  lock_acquire+0x111/0x320
[  459.364285]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.364846]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.365390]  __mutex_lock+0xf9/0x12a0
[  459.365948]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.366493]  ? bdev_evict_inode+0x1f0/0x1f0
[  459.367130]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.367678]  ? destroy_inode+0xbc/0x110
[  459.368261]  ? mutex_trylock+0x1a0/0x1a0
[  459.368867]  ? __blkdev_get+0x3e6/0x1280
[  459.369463]  ? bdev_disk_changed+0x1d0/0x1d0
[  459.370114]  ? blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.370656]  blkdev_get+0xce/0xbe0
[  459.371178]  ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
[  459.371774]  ? __blkdev_get+0x1280/0x1280
[  459.372383]  ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680
[  459.373002]  ? lock_acquire+0x111/0x320
[  459.373587]  ? bd_acquire+0x21/0x2c0
[  459.374134]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250
[  459.374780]  blkdev_open+0x202/0x290
[  459.375325]  do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050
[  459.375924]  ? blkdev_get_by_dev+0x70/0x70
[  459.376543]  ? __x64_sys_fchdir+0x1f0/0x1f0
[  459.377192]  ? inode_permission+0xbe/0x3a0
[  459.377818]  path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50
[  459.378392]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280
[  459.379016]  ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  459.379802]  ? path_lookupat.isra.0+0x900/0x900
[  459.380489]  ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140
[  459.381093]  do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280
[  459.381654]  ? may_open_dev+0xf0/0xf0
[  459.382214]  ? find_held_lock+0x2c/0x110
[  459.382816]  ? lock_downgrade+0x680/0x680
[  459.383425]  ? __lock_is_held+0xad/0x140
[  459.384024]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4f/0x250
[  459.384668]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30
[  459.385280]  ? __alloc_fd+0x448/0x560
[  459.385841]  do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500
[  459.386386]  ? filp_open+0x70/0x70
[  459.386911]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[  459.387610]  ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x55/0x1c0
[  459.388342]  ? do_syscall_64+0x1a/0x520
[  459.388930]  do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520
[  459.389490]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  459.390248] RIP: 0033:0x416211
[  459.390720] Code: 75 14 b8 02 00 00 00 0f 05 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83
04 19 00 00 c3 48 83 ec 08 e8 0a fa ff ff 48 89 04 24 b8 02 00 00 00 0f
   05 <48> 8b 3c 24 48 89 c2 e8 53 fa ff ff 48 89 d0 48 83 c4 08 48 3d
      01
[  459.393483] RSP: 002b:00007fe45dfe9a60 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
[  459.394610] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fe45dfea6d4 RCX: 0000000000416211
[  459.395678] RDX: 00007fe45dfe9b0a RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fe45dfe9b00
[  459.396758] RBP: 000000000076bf20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000a
[  459.397930] R10: 0000000000000075 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00000000ffffffff
[  459.399022] R13: 0000000000000bd9 R14: 00000000004cdb80 R15: 000000000076bf2c
[  459.400168]
[  459.400430] Allocated by task 20132:
[  459.401038]  kasan_kmalloc+0xbf/0xe0
[  459.401652]  kmem_cache_alloc+0xd5/0x280
[  459.402330]  bdev_alloc_inode+0x18/0x40
[  459.402970]  alloc_inode+0x5f/0x180
[  459.403510]  iget5_locked+0x57/0xd0
[  459.404095]  bdget+0x94/0x4e0
[  459.404607]  bd_acquire+0xfa/0x2c0
[  459.405113]  blkdev_open+0x110/0x290
[  459.405702]  do_dentry_open+0x49e/0x1050
[  459.406340]  path_openat+0x148c/0x3f50
[  459.406926]  do_filp_open+0x1a1/0x280
[  459.407471]  do_sys_open+0x3c3/0x500
[  459.408010]  do_syscall_64+0xc3/0x520
[  459.408572]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[  459.409415]
[  459.409679] Freed by task 1262:
[  459.410212]  __kasan_slab_free+0x129/0x170
[  459.410919]  kmem_cache_free+0xb2/0x2a0
[  459.411564]  rcu_process_callbacks+0xbb2/0x2320
[  459.412318]  __do_softirq+0x225/0x8ac

Fix this by delaying bdput() to the end of blkdev_get() which means we
have finished accessing bdev.

Fixes: 77ea887 ("implement in-kernel gendisk events handling")
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I642bd3c3224cc174ba4bdd57133b1a17fb35dccd
CVE-2020-15436
Signed-off-by: Kevin F. Haggerty <[email protected]>
AndDiSa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2021
This is a fix for syzkaller719569, where memory registration was
attempted without any underlying transport being loaded.

Analysis of the case reveals that it is the setsockopt() RDS_GET_MR
(2) and RDS_GET_MR_FOR_DEST (7) that are vulnerable.

Here is an example stack trace when the bug is hit:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000c0
IP: __rds_rdma_map+0x36/0x440 [rds]
PGD 2f93d03067 P4D 2f93d03067 PUD 2f93d02067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: bridge stp llc tun rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4
dns_resolver nfs fscache rds binfmt_misc sb_edac intel_powerclamp
coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul c rc32_pclmul
ghash_clmulni_intel pcbc aesni_intel crypto_simd glue_helper cryptd
iTCO_wdt mei_me sg iTCO_vendor_support ipmi_si mei ipmi_devintf nfsd
shpchp pcspkr i2c_i801 ioatd ma ipmi_msghandler wmi lpc_ich mfd_core
auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc ip_tables ext4 mbcache jbd2
mgag200 i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper ixgbe syscopyarea ahci sysfillrect
sysimgblt libahci mdio fb_sys_fops ttm ptp libata sd_mod mlx4_core drm
crc32c_intel pps_core megaraid_sas i2c_core dca dm_mirror
dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
CPU: 48 PID: 45787 Comm: repro_set2 Not tainted 4.14.2-3.el7uek.x86_64 #2
Hardware name: Oracle Corporation ORACLE SERVER X5-2L/ASM,MOBO TRAY,2U, BIOS 31110000 03/03/2017
task: ffff882f9190db00 task.stack: ffffc9002b994000
RIP: 0010:__rds_rdma_map+0x36/0x440 [rds]
RSP: 0018:ffffc9002b997df0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff882fa2182580 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc9002b997e40 RDI: ffff882fa2182580
RBP: ffffc9002b997e30 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: ffff885fb29e3838 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff882fa2182580
R13: ffff882fa2182580 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 0000000020000ffc
FS:  00007fbffa20b700(0000) GS:ffff882fbfb80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000000000c0 CR3: 0000002f98a66006 CR4: 00000000001606e0
Call Trace:
 rds_get_mr+0x56/0x80 [rds]
 rds_setsockopt+0x172/0x340 [rds]
 ? __fget_light+0x25/0x60
 ? __fdget+0x13/0x20
 SyS_setsockopt+0x80/0xe0
 do_syscall_64+0x67/0x1b0
 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
RIP: 0033:0x7fbff9b117f9
RSP: 002b:00007fbffa20aed8 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000c84a4 RCX: 00007fbff9b117f9
RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000400000000114 RDI: 000000000000109b
RBP: 00007fbffa20af10 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: 00007fbff9dd7860
R10: 0000000020000ffc R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fbffa20b9c0 R14: 00007fbffa20b700 R15: 0000000000000021

Code: 41 56 41 55 49 89 fd 41 54 53 48 83 ec 18 8b 87 f0 02 00 00 48
89 55 d0 48 89 4d c8 85 c0 0f 84 2d 03 00 00 48 8b 87 00 03 00 00 <48>
83 b8 c0 00 00 00 00 0f 84 25 03 00 0 0 48 8b 06 48 8b 56 08

The fix is to check the existence of an underlying transport in
__rds_rdma_map().

Signed-off-by: Håkon Bugge <[email protected]>
Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants