-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal to use python libs instead of parquet tools #5
Comments
I agree that it's a good idea to use a python lib to read in parquet files. Editing parquet files might be a bit inefficient using any text editor. |
@yuj would you be interested in taking a PR to accomplish this? I tried to do this separately as a fork (https://github.com/dogversioning/sublime-parquet-python), which changes the rendering options (the python tools I used as a first pass don't support JSON output), but the sublime text folks have a light preference to consolidate these approaches if possible. |
@dogversioning PRs are always welcome! Please send it over. Eventually I guess we all still prefer @pokidovea suggestion that uses |
@yuj yeah, i think it makes sense - this was more of an incremental approach to solve an acute issue, but something like that was next on my list of things to potentially tackle. Anyway, give me a bit to reconcile the fork approach with a in place one and i'll open a PR. |
@yuj So I spent a little time this morning looking into this - there's some tradeoffs:
If the first one doesn't bother you and you're ok with the hoops on the latter (I think for something of this scope the pre-built route isn't worth the effort), than it :could: be done. But it's an open question if this makes the barrier to entry too complex. |
It is not convenient to install Java-based parquet tools. There is at least one python lib for work with parquet pyarrow.
There are some advantages to use this lib:
What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: