Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confirm Banking with II = 1 is correct for two accesses scheduled at different cycles #304

Open
mattfel1 opened this issue May 7, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@mattfel1
Copy link
Member

mattfel1 commented May 7, 2020

This is a reminder to check if banking works when you have two accesses separated in the schedule. It should be smart enough to account for the iterator offset due to time, but I want to make sure. For example

Foreach(...){ i =>
   ... = sram(i)
   retimeGate()
   ... = sram(i-1)
}

I expect this to have II = 1 and bank with something like N = 2, B = 2, a = 1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant