You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When declaring a secret volume with the scope service=foo,service=bar, secret-op will currently search for a secret with the label secrets.stackable.tech/service=bar, forgetting about service=foo entirely.
Secret-op should endeavour find a secret with both scopes.
Possible solution
Secret-op could query for a comma-separated list of services, such as secrets.stackable.tech/service=foo,bar.
Additional context
No response
Environment
No response
Would you like to work on fixing this bug?
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Comma-separation doesn't really work, both because of the 63-character label limit, and because we don't have a good separator (assuming that we leave . for #307).
Another alternative would be to split it into secrets.stackable.tech/service.0=foo&secrets.stackable.tech/service.1=bar.
Affected version
23.7
Current and expected behavior
When declaring a secret volume with the scope
service=foo,service=bar
, secret-op will currently search for a secret with the labelsecrets.stackable.tech/service=bar
, forgetting aboutservice=foo
entirely.Secret-op should endeavour find a secret with both scopes.
Possible solution
Secret-op could query for a comma-separated list of services, such as
secrets.stackable.tech/service=foo,bar
.Additional context
No response
Environment
No response
Would you like to work on fixing this bug?
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: