You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The following are the steps I took to analyze GC-MS.
When it comes to FillChromPeaksParam, this function requires the use of XCMSnExp objects.
The objects I use in the fifth step will be XcmsExperiment objects.
I don’t know if there is any way to handle the conversion of objects, or Are there any suggestions for optimization steps?
I see, no, indeed, you are right. The use of FillChromPeaksParam is no longer supported with XcmsExperiment. This method notoriously underestimated the gap-filled data, thus it is highly suggested to use the ChromPeakAreaParam instead, that integrates the data from the m/z-rt ranges of the actually identified chromatographic peaks.
But note that I have also just recently implemented the possibility to change from a XcmsExperiment to XCMSnExp object - if you really want to apply the old method. This can be done with xdata <- as(xdata, "XCMSnExp") after installing the current xcms version from my branch (i.e. using BiocManager::install("sneumann/xcms", ref = "jomain").
The following are the steps I took to analyze GC-MS.
When it comes to FillChromPeaksParam, this function requires the use of
XCMSnExp
objects.The objects I use in the fifth step will be
XcmsExperiment
objects.I don’t know if there is any way to handle the conversion of objects, or Are there any suggestions for optimization steps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: