Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Convolution #6

Open
cjordan opened this issue Jan 5, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Convolution #6

cjordan opened this issue Jan 5, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@cjordan
Copy link

cjordan commented Jan 5, 2020

Hi!

Not sure if there's a better place for this, so please let me know if I'm out of line.

I'm (slowly) trying to port an existing python package of mine to rust. One of the first stumbling blocks was the (apparent) lack of a convolution function available in various rust libraries. Below is my solution.

(Also, I believe that using ffts for convolution is better only when the data is sufficiently big, so I'm interested in the naive method).

/// This function aims to reproduce the behaviour of numpy's convolve with
/// mode='same'.
pub fn convolve(data: ArrayView1<f64>, window: ArrayView1<f64>) -> Array1<f64> {
    let padded = stack![
        Axis(0),
        Array1::zeros(window.len() / 2),
        data,
        Array1::zeros(window.len() / 2)
    ];
    let mut w = window.view();
    w.invert_axis(Axis(0));

    padded
        .windows(w.len())
        .into_iter()
        .map(|x| (&x * &w).sum())
        .collect()
}

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
    use super::*;
    use float_cmp::*;

    #[test]
    fn convolve_odd_odd() {
        let data = array![1., 2., 3.];
        let window = array![0., 1., 0.5];
        let expected = array![1., 2.5, 4.];

        for (exp, res) in expected.iter().zip(&convolve(data.view(), window.view())) {
            assert!(approx_eq!(f64, *exp, *res, ulps = 2));
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn convolve_even_odd() {
        let data = array![1., 2., 3., 4.];
        let window = array![0., 1., 0.5];
        let expected = array![1., 2.5, 4., 5.5];

        for (exp, res) in expected.iter().zip(&convolve(data.view(), window.view())) {
            assert!(approx_eq!(f64, *exp, *res, ulps = 2));
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn convolve_even_even() {
        let data = array![1., 2., 3., 4.];
        let window = array![1., 0.5];
        let expected = array![1., 2.5, 4., 5.5];

        for (exp, res) in expected.iter().zip(&convolve(data.view(), window.view())) {
            assert!(approx_eq!(f64, *exp, *res, ulps = 2));
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn convolve_odd_even() {
        let data = array![1., 2., 3., 4., 5.];
        let window = array![1., 0.5];
        let expected = array![1., 2.5, 4., 5.5, 7.];

        for (exp, res) in expected.iter().zip(&convolve(data.view(), window.view())) {
            assert!(approx_eq!(f64, *exp, *res, ulps = 2));
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn convolve_odd_odd2() {
        let data = array![1., 2., 3., 4., 5.];
        let window = array![2., 1., 0., 1., 0.5];
        let result = convolve(data.view(), window.view());
        let expected = array![8., 12., 16.5, 9., 5.5];

        for (exp, res) in expected.iter().zip(&result) {
            assert!(approx_eq!(f64, *exp, *res, ulps = 2));
        }
    }

    #[test]
    fn convolve3() {
        let data = array![1., 2., 3., 4.];
        let window = array![1., 0., 1., 0.5];
        let result = convolve(data.view(), window.view());
        let expected = array![2., 4., 6.5, 4.];

        for (exp, res) in expected.iter().zip(&result) {
            assert!(approx_eq!(f64, *exp, *res, ulps = 2));
        }
    }

This probably could be better; any suggestions are welcome. I have no idea how to generalise this for higher dimensional arrays, so that's also a consideration. I'd be happy to put this into a PR if it's suitable somewhere.

@LukeMathWalker
Copy link
Member

It would definitely be nice to have this as an example! Would you mind opening a PR? Then we can discuss the implementation details there, which is better suited to comment on specific lines 😁

I would go as far as saying that if you have a complete port of np.convolve it would probably be a good addition to ndarray itself!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants