Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which one to choose? #59

Closed
fliphess opened this issue Dec 14, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Which one to choose? #59

fliphess opened this issue Dec 14, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@fliphess
Copy link

Hey @puuu !

I've recently bought a sonoff rf bridge which I modded to use the direct mod which gives me in effect an esp8266 and some rf hardware in a nice plastic box.

I saw your engagement in the openmqttgateway project and after that I noticed this project too and now I'm not sure which one to choose if I don't need any bluetooth, IR and sensor fucntionality (if that was the case I'd choose the openmqttgateway instantly).

Both projects share the same rf library for pilight and this project is already using the mqtt convention that I am looking for.

You seem to know both projects very well and as both seem well maintained and intensively documented projects in which lot's of effort is put, I'm not sure which is the one that suits best to my sonoff rf bridge.

Can you shine a little light on the main differences? Is it mostly the additional functionality for sensors and other RF libraries that can be used with the openmqttgateway or is there more functionality I need to know of before I make a choice?

(And off course thanks so much for creating the pilight arduino RF library!)

@fliphess
Copy link
Author

Closing this after reading #35 (I think this project (MQTT433gateway) is more suitable to my needs as it's less bulky, memory hungry and more focussed on the task i want it to perform rather than all the sensory stuff :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant