-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
28% difference in irradiance, shouldn't poles be symmetric? #96
Comments
That does seem weird. To investigate more, I'd recommend looking at the elements of |
winter_solstice = datetime.datetime(2018, 12, 21, 12, 0, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc) Yields: 0.0 |
Adding debug prints to that function: def get_radiation_direct(when, altitude_deg): Day: 355 |
When I look at 80N 0E at the summer solstice vs 80S 0E at the winter solstice, I get 746 vs 955 W/m^2, which seems weird.
I iterated around those times and verified that the sun is at the same elevation and that it's the local maximum, and even checked the earth-sun distance. Neither of those seem like they should account for such a large difference in irradiance. Are you modeling the ozone hole or something?
Test code:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: