Autoware Sensing Perception Working Group Meeting 2024-08-21

[drwnz]

Administrative

• Previous meeting
• Meeting time: Every second Wednesday, 10am UTC (alternating with Mapping WG)
• WG Google Drive
• Wiki page for this Working Group
• Shared issue list

Attendees

Chaired by Koji

Agenda

• Introduction of new attendees
• Review of Issue List and assignment
• Review of Project Board and assignment

Discussion topics

• Announcements

• Review of Project Board and assignment

  • Project board introduction from Amadeusz - consider merging T4's internal board with the AWF one to avoid double work

• Question about LiDAR-radar calibration (Armagan from Leo Drive)

  • Does anyone have any tools that we can use?
  • Koji: Today's attendants from TIER IV cannot answer that question, so please ask kenzo or David later on (on discord or in next working group meeting)

• Question about the GitHub projects for sensing/perception account (Amadeusz from TIER IV)

  • Amadeusz: Want to add automated flows for instance, which involve some destructive changes to the current board. Currently it is added manually.
  • Armagan: How about labels?
  • Amadeusz: It would require GitHub Actions modification.
  • Amadeusz: One other drawback is that it has free account and can have one automated workflow.
  • (Fatih joined)
  • Fatih: We already have some automation, e.g. adding labels.
  • Fatih: Understood. I will give Amadeusz the permission. Feel free to modify it.

• AV2.0 proposal (Armagan from Leo Drive)

  • Can we move from our current architecture to the perception unified model as a starting point?

• Announcements about prediction (Taekjin from TIER IV)

  • Prediction latency has been significantly improved within this two weeks, so if you have any issues related to it, please update to the latest version.

• Question about the possible discussion on interior perception (David from PIX)

  • Is interior perception within the scope of this working group?
  • Koji: I think so. But I also think that we didn't have such discussion before.

• Question: Any expectations from TIER IV to OSS community? (Fatih from Leo Drive)

  • Max: Code quality of some PRs should be improved, but it takes a lot of time to both end.
  • Fatih: Maybe we can introduce Package Quality Categories like ROS community

Action items

• [ ]