Replies: 5 comments 15 replies
-
I would definitely be curious of a screenshot (or quick video ?) of your setup ! I presume you have 1 proof image per price in your case ? So it does require a bit of time to first upload the proof, and then add the single price. The current price addition workflow is indeed better for multiple prices. This discussion would help in offloading the time spent per proof/price and leave it to the community. 3'40 per price is too long 😢 And we could use some image detection/cropping
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here's some feedback after a few price logging sessions, using some of your advice regarding the workflow : A/ First session 1/ Upload the proofs using the webapp on the phone ( same type, same folder for source image, same shop location, same date, same currency ) for all the 29 pictures, it took 20' so on average 41" per picture, including 13" really uploading ( when you hit the green button after selecting the file/image, the button is spinning and when it's over the "done" button is unlocked and you can go into the menu and start the next proof. 2/ Log The prices Hit "TYPE A BARCODE" Here there's probably something to do in term of keyboard shortcuts, where the focus gonna be/should be every time we validate each step, there's probably a few keystroke, pointer movement to be saved... 19 prices in 18'42" or 1122" 59" per price So combined, per proof+price, it averages 1'40" per price ( upload and logging ). This is, what I consider, a significantly favorable sample as I trimmed my .txt file containing the EANs so I only have products from this shop and sorted in the order I go through the shop - there's a caveat here, the order in which I upload the proof might have an slight impact, it'd better to have the same order on the .txt file and on the proof gallery. I also keep the new products ( the ones that are not on my EAN trimmed list/.txt file ) as process separately - and it takes a lot more time ( change the quantity on OFF, add the brand, create the product from scratch...), but it's significant in my case, I'd say for every 15 to 20 known product ( allow fast mode, copy paste EAN and that's it ) there are 3 to 5 which require the slow way, I have a ballpark somewhere, I'll try to look for it B/ Second session 1/ I copied the proof pictures from the phone to the laptop in a dedicated folder, then upload the proofs using the browser of the laptop instead of the doing on the phone like in A/. 2/ log the prices : x13 prices in 12'17" soit 737" ou 57" per price Combined 1'30" per proof+price ( upload and logging ) C/ Third session 1/ Same method as in B/ ( copy pictures from phone to laptop, then upload from laptop ) 2/ log the prices : 11'40" for 11 prices or 700" averages 64" per price Combined 1'33" per proof+price ( upload and logging ) One thing that still slows the process, is once the price is sent the dashboard page is automatically loaded, then you need to click the Proof button at the end of each price, load the gallery, look for the next proof - if we went back directly to the proof gallery we could save some time - even more if there was an option to display only the proofs with 0 price (having a "stack/deck" of proofs to go through for one session, the stack would slim down every time we log price - only proofs with 0 price would stay in the "stack/deck" to be exploited - so if you mess up the upload order compare to your list of EANs and proceed in reverse order, each time you need to load 1 or more block of X proofs - a more desirable situation would be the first ( at the top ) proof you load/see in the proof gallery is the one associated with the next EAN on your list. Hope it's not too messy. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Related: I've noticed losing a bit of time when mistyping/misreading barcodes, so I've proposed a solution here: openfoodfacts/open-prices-frontend#991 Note that this doesn't really help on the above feedback. It might even worsen it, since it breaks some of the enter key shortcuts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
With the recent "Contribution assistant" built by @TTalex , I'm seeing 2 (or 3) seperate steps that we could isolate, allowing distribution on multiple users. Some of these thoughts have already been shared in a similar discussion - #523 - and some related issues. Step 1: upload 1 or multiple proofs [user]Speed up proof addition when a user has multiple proofs for a given location & date. Related issuesStep 2: extract data from images [AI/ML]
Related issues
Step 3: ask users to validate the price predictions [user]Last step, we have price info that has been extracted from the images, we need a user to validate and make sure that it is the correct product (or raw category) and price. Related issues |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Should we split the discussion ? as :
Example : In the above workflow I'd, personally, would put "Classify receipt/price tag" on the 1st step since when I have a batch of price/pictures to upload I do them all, without receipt in between... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently
@serpico (extracted from #523)
Related issues
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions