Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can simple trainer actually be simple? #503

Open
min-hieu-netropy opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Can simple trainer actually be simple? #503

min-hieu-netropy opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@min-hieu-netropy
Copy link

Why is this example so needlessly complicated? -- pose optimizer, multi-gpu, bilateral grid, streaming output, etc. This is completely different from the 2D example where a concise, clear, and complete code is given.

@felixniemeyer
Copy link

felixniemeyer commented Dec 30, 2024

maybe we can have two examples:
minimal-trainer and comprehensive-trainer

Some people like me primarily want to apply gsplat to datasets and are happy about all features being implemented :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants