Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation autosearch is not very good #104

Open
BoltonBailey opened this issue Dec 2, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Documentation autosearch is not very good #104

BoltonBailey opened this issue Dec 2, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@BoltonBailey
Copy link

Here is a screenshot of the result when I search for list.map

Screen Shot 2020-12-02 at 3 36 46 PM

As you can see list.map is a real function, but for some reason it is not the first result - I have to look almost to the bottom of the list of hits to find it. When I type in the exact name of the function I'm looking up the docs for, it should be the first hit on the drop down.

@robertylewis robertylewis transferred this issue from leanprover-community/mathlib3 Dec 3, 2020
@robertylewis
Copy link
Member

There are plans to overhaul the docs search, but I wouldn't expect changes in the immediate future.

@BoltonBailey
Copy link
Author

Just another thing I've found to try to convince people this issue is important: In a discussion on the zulip, someone brought up "big_operators" and I didn't know what it was. I searched for it, and got no result. It finally had to be linked to me by someone in the chat.

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 5 22 37 PM

@bryangingechen
Copy link
Collaborator

One thing which is very far from obvious at the moment is that clicking the search button does something totally unrelated to the choices in the drop down menu -- it performs a google search on leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib_docs. In this example, it does find a bunch of big_operators hits.

Making that feature more discoverable from the UI somehow could be an easy PR with a decent impact on usability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants