Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Ubuntu] thick underline #8880

Open
paolobenve opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

[Ubuntu] thick underline #8880

paolobenve opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@paolobenve
Copy link

Describe the bug

The metric that specify the underline thickness sets it too thick.

To Reproduce

use libreoffice 24.2+, make a new document and add characters, give them ubuntu font, and underline them: the underlining line appears too thick

Expected behavior

The line should be thinner

Screenshots

Image

Additional context

Version: 24.8.4.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 480(Build:2)
CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: es-DO (C.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Ubuntu package version: 4:24.8.4rc2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1lo1
Calc: threaded

This LO version uses native font metric for underlining

@kenmcd
Copy link

kenmcd commented Jan 12, 2025

This should be posted in the upstream repo.
https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-Sans-fonts/issues

Note, the underline position and thickness is the same for all weights.
So the Light and Regular may look a little heavy.
And the Bold and ExtraBold may look a little light.

Common for fonts to have all weights be the same now.
Then if you underline some text in applications such as LibreOffice you can mix Regular and Bold without looking odd.
But it is a trade-off as single weights may not be visually optimal.

LibreOffice used to ignore the font settings and had just one same generic underline position and thickness for all fonts - which usually looked pretty bad (too tight and too thin). Using the actual font settings is relatively new.

Anyway, you need to report this in the source repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants